Reliability of anthropometric measurements in children with special needs.
<h4>Objectives</h4> <p>To determine the reliability of anthropometric and body composition measurements in children with special needs.</p> <h4>Design</h4> <p>Observational study.</p> <h4>Setting</h4> <p>Specialist support schools (p...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
| _version_ | 1826277340951347200 |
|---|---|
| author | Hardy, J Kuter, H Campbell, M Canoy, D |
| author_facet | Hardy, J Kuter, H Campbell, M Canoy, D |
| author_sort | Hardy, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <h4>Objectives</h4> <p>To determine the reliability of anthropometric and body composition measurements in children with special needs.</p> <h4>Design</h4> <p>Observational study.</p> <h4>Setting</h4> <p>Specialist support schools (primary and secondary) in Manchester, UK.</p> <h4>Participants</h4> <p>53 children with moderate-to-severe learning disability; 30 non-standers (14 boys) and 23 standers (15 boys). Mean ages were 11 years (range 3–20) for non-standers and 12.4 years (range 8–19) for standers.</p> <h4>Measures</h4> <p>Anthropometric measures included: height/length, segmental measures, weight, skinfolds, body circumferences and body composition estimated from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). These were measured twice, 2–4 weeks apart.</p> <h4>Main outcome measures</h4> <p>Reliability was assessed using the technical error of measurement (TEM).</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>The TEM for height and supine length was 0.55 cm for standers and 2.47 cm for non-standers, respectively. For non-standers, the TEMs for knee height and tibial length were 0.81 and 1.57 cm, respectively. The TEM for weight was 0.55 kg for standers and 0.75 kg for non-standers. For skinfold thickness, the TEM was smaller for non-standers than standers. The TEM for mid-upper arm circumference for standers and nonstanders was 0.91 and 0.82 cm, respectively. The TEM for BIA in standers and non-standers was 34.7 and 54.1 Ω, respectively. Some measurements, including waist circumferences, were difficult to obtain reliably.</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Anthropometric and body composition measurements were feasible to obtain in children with special needs. However, the reliability of these measures differs between non-standers and standers and should be considered when choosing appropriate measures.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:27:26Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:6adc8b9a-39f5-4b16-8c4d-6c80a41c674d |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:27:26Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:6adc8b9a-39f5-4b16-8c4d-6c80a41c674d2022-03-26T19:00:08ZReliability of anthropometric measurements in children with special needs.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6adc8b9a-39f5-4b16-8c4d-6c80a41c674dEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing Group2018Hardy, JKuter, HCampbell, MCanoy, D <h4>Objectives</h4> <p>To determine the reliability of anthropometric and body composition measurements in children with special needs.</p> <h4>Design</h4> <p>Observational study.</p> <h4>Setting</h4> <p>Specialist support schools (primary and secondary) in Manchester, UK.</p> <h4>Participants</h4> <p>53 children with moderate-to-severe learning disability; 30 non-standers (14 boys) and 23 standers (15 boys). Mean ages were 11 years (range 3–20) for non-standers and 12.4 years (range 8–19) for standers.</p> <h4>Measures</h4> <p>Anthropometric measures included: height/length, segmental measures, weight, skinfolds, body circumferences and body composition estimated from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). These were measured twice, 2–4 weeks apart.</p> <h4>Main outcome measures</h4> <p>Reliability was assessed using the technical error of measurement (TEM).</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>The TEM for height and supine length was 0.55 cm for standers and 2.47 cm for non-standers, respectively. For non-standers, the TEMs for knee height and tibial length were 0.81 and 1.57 cm, respectively. The TEM for weight was 0.55 kg for standers and 0.75 kg for non-standers. For skinfold thickness, the TEM was smaller for non-standers than standers. The TEM for mid-upper arm circumference for standers and nonstanders was 0.91 and 0.82 cm, respectively. The TEM for BIA in standers and non-standers was 34.7 and 54.1 Ω, respectively. Some measurements, including waist circumferences, were difficult to obtain reliably.</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Anthropometric and body composition measurements were feasible to obtain in children with special needs. However, the reliability of these measures differs between non-standers and standers and should be considered when choosing appropriate measures.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Hardy, J Kuter, H Campbell, M Canoy, D Reliability of anthropometric measurements in children with special needs. |
| title | Reliability of anthropometric measurements in children with special needs. |
| title_full | Reliability of anthropometric measurements in children with special needs. |
| title_fullStr | Reliability of anthropometric measurements in children with special needs. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of anthropometric measurements in children with special needs. |
| title_short | Reliability of anthropometric measurements in children with special needs. |
| title_sort | reliability of anthropometric measurements in children with special needs |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hardyj reliabilityofanthropometricmeasurementsinchildrenwithspecialneeds AT kuterh reliabilityofanthropometricmeasurementsinchildrenwithspecialneeds AT campbellm reliabilityofanthropometricmeasurementsinchildrenwithspecialneeds AT canoyd reliabilityofanthropometricmeasurementsinchildrenwithspecialneeds |