CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary delphi consensus study: identifying language impairments in children

<em>This record also includes a French translation of the article.</em> <br><br> Delayed or impaired language development is a common developmental concern, yet there is little agreement about the criteria used to identify and classify language impairments in children. Childr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bishop, D, Snowling, M, Thompson, P, Greenhalgh, T, CATALISE Consortium
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2016
_version_ 1797073830817038336
author Bishop, D
Snowling, M
Thompson, P
Greenhalgh, T
CATALISE Consortium
author_facet Bishop, D
Snowling, M
Thompson, P
Greenhalgh, T
CATALISE Consortium
author_sort Bishop, D
collection OXFORD
description <em>This record also includes a French translation of the article.</em> <br><br> Delayed or impaired language development is a common developmental concern, yet there is little agreement about the criteria used to identify and classify language impairments in children. Children's language difficulties are at the interface between education, medicine and the allied professions, who may all adopt different approaches to conceptualising them. Our goal in this study was to use an online Delphi technique to see whether it was possible to achieve consensus among professionals on appropriate criteria for identifying children who might benefit from specialist services. We recruited a panel of 59 experts representing ten disciplines (including education, psychology, speech-language therapy/pathology, paediatrics and child psychiatry) from English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom and USA). The starting point for round 1 was a set of 46 statements based on articles and commentaries in a special issue of a journal focusing on this topic. Panel members rated each statement for both relevance and validity on a seven-point scale, and added free text comments. These responses were synthesised by the first two authors, who then removed, combined or modified items with a view to improving consensus. The resulting set of statements was returned to the panel for a second evaluation (round 2). Consensus (percentage reporting 'agree' or 'strongly agree') was at least 80 percent for 24 of 27 round 2 statements, though many respondents qualified their response with written comments. These were again synthesised by the first two authors. The resulting consensus statement is reported here, with additional summary of relevant evidence, and a concluding commentary on residual disagreements and gaps in the evidence base.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:27:39Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6af1a573-48e4-4ce4-95dc-408371e41925
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:27:39Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6af1a573-48e4-4ce4-95dc-408371e419252022-03-26T19:00:39ZCATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary delphi consensus study: identifying language impairments in childrenJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6af1a573-48e4-4ce4-95dc-408371e41925EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2016Bishop, DSnowling, MThompson, PGreenhalgh, TCATALISE Consortium<em>This record also includes a French translation of the article.</em> <br><br> Delayed or impaired language development is a common developmental concern, yet there is little agreement about the criteria used to identify and classify language impairments in children. Children's language difficulties are at the interface between education, medicine and the allied professions, who may all adopt different approaches to conceptualising them. Our goal in this study was to use an online Delphi technique to see whether it was possible to achieve consensus among professionals on appropriate criteria for identifying children who might benefit from specialist services. We recruited a panel of 59 experts representing ten disciplines (including education, psychology, speech-language therapy/pathology, paediatrics and child psychiatry) from English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom and USA). The starting point for round 1 was a set of 46 statements based on articles and commentaries in a special issue of a journal focusing on this topic. Panel members rated each statement for both relevance and validity on a seven-point scale, and added free text comments. These responses were synthesised by the first two authors, who then removed, combined or modified items with a view to improving consensus. The resulting set of statements was returned to the panel for a second evaluation (round 2). Consensus (percentage reporting 'agree' or 'strongly agree') was at least 80 percent for 24 of 27 round 2 statements, though many respondents qualified their response with written comments. These were again synthesised by the first two authors. The resulting consensus statement is reported here, with additional summary of relevant evidence, and a concluding commentary on residual disagreements and gaps in the evidence base.
spellingShingle Bishop, D
Snowling, M
Thompson, P
Greenhalgh, T
CATALISE Consortium
CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary delphi consensus study: identifying language impairments in children
title CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary delphi consensus study: identifying language impairments in children
title_full CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary delphi consensus study: identifying language impairments in children
title_fullStr CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary delphi consensus study: identifying language impairments in children
title_full_unstemmed CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary delphi consensus study: identifying language impairments in children
title_short CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary delphi consensus study: identifying language impairments in children
title_sort catalise a multinational and multidisciplinary delphi consensus study identifying language impairments in children
work_keys_str_mv AT bishopd cataliseamultinationalandmultidisciplinarydelphiconsensusstudyidentifyinglanguageimpairmentsinchildren
AT snowlingm cataliseamultinationalandmultidisciplinarydelphiconsensusstudyidentifyinglanguageimpairmentsinchildren
AT thompsonp cataliseamultinationalandmultidisciplinarydelphiconsensusstudyidentifyinglanguageimpairmentsinchildren
AT greenhalght cataliseamultinationalandmultidisciplinarydelphiconsensusstudyidentifyinglanguageimpairmentsinchildren
AT cataliseconsortium cataliseamultinationalandmultidisciplinarydelphiconsensusstudyidentifyinglanguageimpairmentsinchildren