Comparing Phylogeographies to Reveal Incompatible Geographical Histories within Genomes

Modern phylogeography aims at reconstructing the geographic movement of organisms based on their genomic sequences and spatial information. Phylogeographic approaches are often applied to pathogen sequences and therefore tend to neglect the possibility of recombination, which decouples the evolution...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Singer, B, Di Nardo, A, Hein, J, Ferretti, L
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2024
_version_ 1811140028930195456
author Singer, B
Di Nardo, A
Hein, J
Ferretti, L
author_facet Singer, B
Di Nardo, A
Hein, J
Ferretti, L
author_sort Singer, B
collection OXFORD
description Modern phylogeography aims at reconstructing the geographic movement of organisms based on their genomic sequences and spatial information. Phylogeographic approaches are often applied to pathogen sequences and therefore tend to neglect the possibility of recombination, which decouples the evolutionary and geographic histories of different parts of the genome. Genomic regions of recombining or reassorting pathogens often originate and evolve at different times and locations, which characterize their unique spatial histories. Measuring the extent of these differences requires new methods to compare geographic information on phylogenetic trees reconstructed from different parts of the genome. Here we develop for the first time a set of measures of phylogeographic incompatibility, aimed at detecting differences between geographical histories in terms of distances between phylogeographies. We study the effect of varying demography and recombination on phylogeographic incompatibilities using coalescent simulations. We further apply these measures to the evolutionary history of human and livestock pathogens, either reassorting or recombining, such as the Victoria and Yamagata lineages of influenza B and the O/Ind-2001 foot-and-mouth disease virus strain. Our results reveal diverse geographical paths of migration that characterize the origins and evolutionary histories of different viral genes and genomic segments. These incompatibility measures can be applied to any phylogeography, and more generally to any phylogeny where each tip has been assigned either a continuous or discrete “trait” independent of the sequence. We illustrate this flexibility with an analysis of the interplay between the phylogeography and phylolinguistics of Uralic-speaking human populations, hinting at patrilinear language transmission.
first_indexed 2024-09-25T04:15:28Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6b2e8a7d-9489-4673-aac8-e2505cf23474
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:15:28Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6b2e8a7d-9489-4673-aac8-e2505cf234742024-07-16T20:11:02ZComparing Phylogeographies to Reveal Incompatible Geographical Histories within GenomesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6b2e8a7d-9489-4673-aac8-e2505cf23474EnglishJisc Publications RouterOxford University Press2024Singer, BDi Nardo, AHein, JFerretti, LModern phylogeography aims at reconstructing the geographic movement of organisms based on their genomic sequences and spatial information. Phylogeographic approaches are often applied to pathogen sequences and therefore tend to neglect the possibility of recombination, which decouples the evolutionary and geographic histories of different parts of the genome. Genomic regions of recombining or reassorting pathogens often originate and evolve at different times and locations, which characterize their unique spatial histories. Measuring the extent of these differences requires new methods to compare geographic information on phylogenetic trees reconstructed from different parts of the genome. Here we develop for the first time a set of measures of phylogeographic incompatibility, aimed at detecting differences between geographical histories in terms of distances between phylogeographies. We study the effect of varying demography and recombination on phylogeographic incompatibilities using coalescent simulations. We further apply these measures to the evolutionary history of human and livestock pathogens, either reassorting or recombining, such as the Victoria and Yamagata lineages of influenza B and the O/Ind-2001 foot-and-mouth disease virus strain. Our results reveal diverse geographical paths of migration that characterize the origins and evolutionary histories of different viral genes and genomic segments. These incompatibility measures can be applied to any phylogeography, and more generally to any phylogeny where each tip has been assigned either a continuous or discrete “trait” independent of the sequence. We illustrate this flexibility with an analysis of the interplay between the phylogeography and phylolinguistics of Uralic-speaking human populations, hinting at patrilinear language transmission.
spellingShingle Singer, B
Di Nardo, A
Hein, J
Ferretti, L
Comparing Phylogeographies to Reveal Incompatible Geographical Histories within Genomes
title Comparing Phylogeographies to Reveal Incompatible Geographical Histories within Genomes
title_full Comparing Phylogeographies to Reveal Incompatible Geographical Histories within Genomes
title_fullStr Comparing Phylogeographies to Reveal Incompatible Geographical Histories within Genomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Phylogeographies to Reveal Incompatible Geographical Histories within Genomes
title_short Comparing Phylogeographies to Reveal Incompatible Geographical Histories within Genomes
title_sort comparing phylogeographies to reveal incompatible geographical histories within genomes
work_keys_str_mv AT singerb comparingphylogeographiestorevealincompatiblegeographicalhistorieswithingenomes
AT dinardoa comparingphylogeographiestorevealincompatiblegeographicalhistorieswithingenomes
AT heinj comparingphylogeographiestorevealincompatiblegeographicalhistorieswithingenomes
AT ferrettil comparingphylogeographiestorevealincompatiblegeographicalhistorieswithingenomes