Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?
Systematic reviews are generally placed above narrative reviews in an assumed hierarchy of secondary research evidence. We argue that systematic reviews and narrative reviews serve different purposes and should be viewed as complementary. Conventional systematic reviews address narrowly focused ques...
Main Authors: | Greenhalgh, T, Thorne, S, Malterud, K |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2018
|
Similar Items
-
Systematic reviews for policymaking: muddling through
by: Greenhalgh, T, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Response to Faggion
by: Greenhalgh, T, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Spurious /
by: 508120 Iyer, Lars
Published: (2011) -
Global hierarchy vs local structure: Spurious self-feedback in scale-free networks
by: Claudia Merger, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01) -
Spurious findings
by: Cook, J, et al.
Published: (2016)