One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications.

Duplicate publication in orthopaedic journals may further an author's academic career but this is at the cost of both scientific integrity and knowledge. Multiple publications of the same work increase the workload of editorial boards, misguide the reader and affect the process of meta-analysis...

पूर्ण विवरण

ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखकों: Gwilym, S, Swan, M, Giele, H
स्वरूप: Journal article
भाषा:English
प्रकाशित: 2004
_version_ 1826277462351282176
author Gwilym, S
Swan, M
Giele, H
author_facet Gwilym, S
Swan, M
Giele, H
author_sort Gwilym, S
collection OXFORD
description Duplicate publication in orthopaedic journals may further an author's academic career but this is at the cost of both scientific integrity and knowledge. Multiple publications of the same work increase the workload of editorial boards, misguide the reader and affect the process of meta-analysis. We found that of 343 'original' articles published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery in 1999, 26 (7.6%) had some degree of redundancy. The prevalence of duplicate publications in the orthopaedic literature appears to be less than that in other surgical specialties but it is still a matter of concern. It is the author's responsibility to notify the editor of any duality when submitting a paper for publication.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:29:15Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6b729869-dfc8-4880-94d7-8d803be42cda
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:29:15Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6b729869-dfc8-4880-94d7-8d803be42cda2022-03-26T19:04:06ZOne in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6b729869-dfc8-4880-94d7-8d803be42cdaEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2004Gwilym, SSwan, MGiele, HDuplicate publication in orthopaedic journals may further an author's academic career but this is at the cost of both scientific integrity and knowledge. Multiple publications of the same work increase the workload of editorial boards, misguide the reader and affect the process of meta-analysis. We found that of 343 'original' articles published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery in 1999, 26 (7.6%) had some degree of redundancy. The prevalence of duplicate publications in the orthopaedic literature appears to be less than that in other surgical specialties but it is still a matter of concern. It is the author's responsibility to notify the editor of any duality when submitting a paper for publication.
spellingShingle Gwilym, S
Swan, M
Giele, H
One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications.
title One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications.
title_full One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications.
title_fullStr One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications.
title_full_unstemmed One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications.
title_short One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications.
title_sort one in 13 original articles in the journal of bone and joint surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications
work_keys_str_mv AT gwilyms onein13originalarticlesinthejournalofboneandjointsurgeryareduplicateorfragmentedpublications
AT swanm onein13originalarticlesinthejournalofboneandjointsurgeryareduplicateorfragmentedpublications
AT gieleh onein13originalarticlesinthejournalofboneandjointsurgeryareduplicateorfragmentedpublications