Attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in England

<h4>Background</h4> <p>There is increasing interest in using quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) to rule-out colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients with high-risk symptoms in primary care.</p> <h4>Aim</h4> <p>The study aimed to investigate general...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Von Wagner, C, Stoffel, S, Freeman, M, Laszlo, H, Nicholson, B, Sheringham, J, Szinay, D, Hirst, Y
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Royal College of General Practitioners 2018
_version_ 1797074021478563840
author Von Wagner, C
Stoffel, S
Freeman, M
Laszlo, H
Nicholson, B
Sheringham, J
Szinay, D
Hirst, Y
author_facet Von Wagner, C
Stoffel, S
Freeman, M
Laszlo, H
Nicholson, B
Sheringham, J
Szinay, D
Hirst, Y
author_sort Von Wagner, C
collection OXFORD
description <h4>Background</h4> <p>There is increasing interest in using quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) to rule-out colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients with high-risk symptoms in primary care.</p> <h4>Aim</h4> <p>The study aimed to investigate general practitioners’ (GP) attitudes and willingness to use FIT over urgent two-week wait (2WW) referral.</p> <h4>Design and Setting</h4> <p>A cross-sectional online survey with 1024GPs based in England</p> <h4>Method</h4> <p>Logistic regression models were used to explore their likelihood of using FIT instead of 2WW, and reported using odds ratios and confidence intervals.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>Just over a third of GPs (n=365) preferred to use FIT as a rule-out test over 2WW. GPs were more willing if they were aged 36-45 (1.59 [1.04-2.43]) and 46-55 (1.99 [1.14-3.47]), thought FIT was highly accurate (1.63 [1.16-2.29]), thought patients will benefit compared to a colonoscopy (2.02 [1.46-2.79]) and were highly confident in discussing the benefits of FIT (2.14 [1.46-3.16]). GPs were less willing if they had had more than 10 urgent referrals in the last year (0.62 [0.40 - 0.94]) and thought that longer consultations will be needed (0.61 [0.44 - 0.83]).</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Our findings suggest that the acceptability of FIT as a rule-out test in primary care is currently low with less than half of GPs who perceived FIT to be accurate preferring it over colonoscopy. Any potential guideline changes recommending FIT in high-risk patients instead of urgent referral to rule-out CRC are likely to require intensive supporting educational outreach to increase GP confidence in the accuracy and application of FIT in this context.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:30:19Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6bcdebfd-5e3f-4d95-b3a5-0f1b53cf150a
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:30:19Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6bcdebfd-5e3f-4d95-b3a5-0f1b53cf150a2022-03-26T19:06:38ZAttitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in EnglandJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6bcdebfd-5e3f-4d95-b3a5-0f1b53cf150aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordRoyal College of General Practitioners2018Von Wagner, CStoffel, SFreeman, MLaszlo, HNicholson, BSheringham, JSzinay, DHirst, Y <h4>Background</h4> <p>There is increasing interest in using quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) to rule-out colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients with high-risk symptoms in primary care.</p> <h4>Aim</h4> <p>The study aimed to investigate general practitioners’ (GP) attitudes and willingness to use FIT over urgent two-week wait (2WW) referral.</p> <h4>Design and Setting</h4> <p>A cross-sectional online survey with 1024GPs based in England</p> <h4>Method</h4> <p>Logistic regression models were used to explore their likelihood of using FIT instead of 2WW, and reported using odds ratios and confidence intervals.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>Just over a third of GPs (n=365) preferred to use FIT as a rule-out test over 2WW. GPs were more willing if they were aged 36-45 (1.59 [1.04-2.43]) and 46-55 (1.99 [1.14-3.47]), thought FIT was highly accurate (1.63 [1.16-2.29]), thought patients will benefit compared to a colonoscopy (2.02 [1.46-2.79]) and were highly confident in discussing the benefits of FIT (2.14 [1.46-3.16]). GPs were less willing if they had had more than 10 urgent referrals in the last year (0.62 [0.40 - 0.94]) and thought that longer consultations will be needed (0.61 [0.44 - 0.83]).</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Our findings suggest that the acceptability of FIT as a rule-out test in primary care is currently low with less than half of GPs who perceived FIT to be accurate preferring it over colonoscopy. Any potential guideline changes recommending FIT in high-risk patients instead of urgent referral to rule-out CRC are likely to require intensive supporting educational outreach to increase GP confidence in the accuracy and application of FIT in this context.</p>
spellingShingle Von Wagner, C
Stoffel, S
Freeman, M
Laszlo, H
Nicholson, B
Sheringham, J
Szinay, D
Hirst, Y
Attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in England
title Attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in England
title_full Attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in England
title_fullStr Attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in England
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in England
title_short Attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in England
title_sort attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer an online survey of gps in england
work_keys_str_mv AT vonwagnerc attitudestowardsfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginpatientsatincreasedriskofcolorectalcanceranonlinesurveyofgpsinengland
AT stoffels attitudestowardsfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginpatientsatincreasedriskofcolorectalcanceranonlinesurveyofgpsinengland
AT freemanm attitudestowardsfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginpatientsatincreasedriskofcolorectalcanceranonlinesurveyofgpsinengland
AT laszloh attitudestowardsfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginpatientsatincreasedriskofcolorectalcanceranonlinesurveyofgpsinengland
AT nicholsonb attitudestowardsfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginpatientsatincreasedriskofcolorectalcanceranonlinesurveyofgpsinengland
AT sheringhamj attitudestowardsfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginpatientsatincreasedriskofcolorectalcanceranonlinesurveyofgpsinengland
AT szinayd attitudestowardsfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginpatientsatincreasedriskofcolorectalcanceranonlinesurveyofgpsinengland
AT hirsty attitudestowardsfaecalimmunochemicaltestinginpatientsatincreasedriskofcolorectalcanceranonlinesurveyofgpsinengland