Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.

Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the impact of spin (ie, reporting to convince readers that the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment is greater than shown by the results) on the interpretation of results of abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the field of cancer. METHODS: We pe...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Main Authors:	Boutron, I, Altman, D, Hopewell, S, Vera-Badillo, F, Tannock, I, Ravaud, P
Formato:	Journal article
Idioma:	English
Publicado em:	American Society of Clinical Oncology 2014

Registos relacionados

Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results Reply
Por: Boutron, I, et al.
Publicado em: (2010)

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.
Por: Boutron, I, et al.
Publicado em: (2010)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
Por: Yavchitz, A, et al.
Publicado em: (2014)

Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Por: Mathieu, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2009)

CONSORT Statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts
Por: Boutron, I, et al.
Publicado em: (2017)

Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited
Por: Lazarus, C, et al.
Publicado em: (2016)

Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial.
Por: Barnes, C, et al.
Publicado em: (2015)

Inadequate description of educational interventions in ongoing randomized controlled trials
Por: Pino Cécile, et al.
Publicado em: (2012-05-01)

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration.
Por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2008)

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration.
Por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2008)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration
Por: Boutron, I, et al.
Publicado em: (2009)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment; explanation and elaboration
Por: Boutron, I, et al.
Publicado em: (2009)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
Por: Boutron, I, et al.
Publicado em: (2008)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
Por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2013)

CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration.
Por: Sally Hopewell, et al.
Publicado em: (2008-01-01)

Abstracts of randomized controlled trials in pediatric dentistry: reporting quality and spin
Por: Feiyang Guo, et al.
Publicado em: (2023-11-01)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomized controlled trials
Por: Chauvin, A, et al.
Publicado em: (2017)

Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed.
Por: Dechartres, A, et al.
Publicado em: (2011)

Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials
Por: Philipp Kapp, et al.
Publicado em: (2022-09-01)

Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences
Por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2015)

Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
Por: Ravaud Philippe, et al.
Publicado em: (2009-05-01)

Reminding peer reviewers of reporting guideline items to improve completeness in published articles: primary results of 2 randomized trials
Por: Speich, B, et al.
Publicado em: (2023)

Influence of the statistical significance of results and spin on readers’ interpretation of the results in an abstract for a hypothetical clinical trial: a randomised trial
Por: Isabelle Boutron, et al.
Publicado em: (2022-04-01)

Sentence retrieval for abstracts of randomized controlled trials
Por: Chung Grace Y
Publicado em: (2009-02-01)

Geographical representativeness of published and ongoing randomized controlled trials. The example of: Tobacco consumption and HIV infection.
Por: Nizar Ahmad, et al.
Publicado em: (2011-01-01)

Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts
Por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2008)

[CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration].
Por: Hopewel, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2008)

Reporting quality of journal abstracts for surgical randomized controlled trials before and after the implementation of the CONSORT extension for abstracts
Por: Speich, B, et al.
Publicado em: (2019)

Spin in Published Reports of Tinnitus Randomized Controlled Trials: Evidence of Overinterpretation of Results
Por: Hedwig M. Velde, et al.
Publicado em: (2021-07-01)

Misrepresentation of randomized controlled trials in press releases and news coverage: a cohort study.
Por: Amélie Yavchitz, et al.
Publicado em: (2012-01-01)

Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.
Por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2012)

Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis
Por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2012)

Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention
Por: Roy Carine, et al.
Publicado em: (2009-04-01)

Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial
Por: Hopewell, S, et al.
Publicado em: (2016)

Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals
Por: Chen, Y, et al.
Publicado em: (2010)

Methods of blinding in reports of randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacologic treatments: a systematic review.
Por: Isabelle Boutron, et al.
Publicado em: (2006-10-01)

Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in five leading Chinese medical journals.
Por: Yaolong Chen, et al.
Publicado em: (2010-08-01)

The reporting quality and spin of randomized controlled trials of endometriosis pain: Methodological study based on CONSORT extension on abstracts.
Por: Hoda Shirafkan, et al.
Publicado em: (2024-01-01)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Por: Speich, B, et al.
Publicado em: (2020)

Comparison of treatment effect estimates for pharmacological randomized controlled trials enrolling older adults only and those including adults: a meta-epidemiological study.
Por: Valérie Seegers, et al.
Publicado em: (2013-01-01)