Conflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in Silene

<p style="text-align:justify;"> <b>Background:</b> Increasing evidence from DNA sequence data has revealed that phylogenies based on different genes may drastically differ from each other. This may be due to either inter- or intralineage processes, or to methodological o...

Fuld beskrivelse

Bibliografiske detaljer
Main Authors: Rautenberg, A, Filatov, D, Svennblad, B, Heidari, N, Oxelman, B
Format: Journal article
Sprog:English
Udgivet: BioMed Central 2008
_version_ 1826277749272084480
author Rautenberg, A
Filatov, D
Svennblad, B
Heidari, N
Oxelman, B
author_facet Rautenberg, A
Filatov, D
Svennblad, B
Heidari, N
Oxelman, B
author_sort Rautenberg, A
collection OXFORD
description <p style="text-align:justify;"> <b>Background:</b> Increasing evidence from DNA sequence data has revealed that phylogenies based on different genes may drastically differ from each other. This may be due to either inter- or intralineage processes, or to methodological or stochastic errors. Here we investigate a spectacular case where two parts of the same gene (SlX1/Y1) show conflicting phylogenies within Silene (Caryophyllaceae). SlX1 and SlY1 are sex-linked genes on the sex chromosomes of dioecious members of Silene sect. Elisanthe.<br/><br/> <b>Results:</b> We sequenced the homologues of the SlX1/Y1 genes in several Sileneae species. We demonstrate that different parts of the SlX1/Y1 region give different phylogenetic signals. The major discrepancy is that Silene vulgaris and S. sect. Conoimorpha (S. conica and relatives) exchange positions. To determine whether gene duplication followed by recombination (an intralineage process) may explain the phylogenetic conflict in the Silene SlX1/Y1 gene, we use a novel probabilistic, multiple primer-pair PCR approach. We did not find any evidence supporting gene duplication/loss as explanation to the phylogenetic conflict.<br/><br/> <b>Conclusion:</b> The phylogenetic conflict in the Silene SlX1/Y1 gene cannot be explained by paralogy or artefacts, such as in vitro recombination during PCR. The support for the conflict is strong enough to exclude methodological or stochastic errors as likely sources. Instead, the phylogenetic incongruence may have been caused by recombination of two divergent alleles following ancient interspecific hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting. These events probably took place several million years ago. This example clearly demonstrates that different parts of the genome may have different evolutionary histories and stresses the importance of using multiple genes in reconstruction of taxonomic relationships. </p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:33:35Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6ce1c5ec-7a00-4638-94b5-6b77a450d3ec
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:33:35Z
publishDate 2008
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6ce1c5ec-7a00-4638-94b5-6b77a450d3ec2022-03-26T19:14:02ZConflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in SileneJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6ce1c5ec-7a00-4638-94b5-6b77a450d3ecEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2008Rautenberg, AFilatov, DSvennblad, BHeidari, NOxelman, B <p style="text-align:justify;"> <b>Background:</b> Increasing evidence from DNA sequence data has revealed that phylogenies based on different genes may drastically differ from each other. This may be due to either inter- or intralineage processes, or to methodological or stochastic errors. Here we investigate a spectacular case where two parts of the same gene (SlX1/Y1) show conflicting phylogenies within Silene (Caryophyllaceae). SlX1 and SlY1 are sex-linked genes on the sex chromosomes of dioecious members of Silene sect. Elisanthe.<br/><br/> <b>Results:</b> We sequenced the homologues of the SlX1/Y1 genes in several Sileneae species. We demonstrate that different parts of the SlX1/Y1 region give different phylogenetic signals. The major discrepancy is that Silene vulgaris and S. sect. Conoimorpha (S. conica and relatives) exchange positions. To determine whether gene duplication followed by recombination (an intralineage process) may explain the phylogenetic conflict in the Silene SlX1/Y1 gene, we use a novel probabilistic, multiple primer-pair PCR approach. We did not find any evidence supporting gene duplication/loss as explanation to the phylogenetic conflict.<br/><br/> <b>Conclusion:</b> The phylogenetic conflict in the Silene SlX1/Y1 gene cannot be explained by paralogy or artefacts, such as in vitro recombination during PCR. The support for the conflict is strong enough to exclude methodological or stochastic errors as likely sources. Instead, the phylogenetic incongruence may have been caused by recombination of two divergent alleles following ancient interspecific hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting. These events probably took place several million years ago. This example clearly demonstrates that different parts of the genome may have different evolutionary histories and stresses the importance of using multiple genes in reconstruction of taxonomic relationships. </p>
spellingShingle Rautenberg, A
Filatov, D
Svennblad, B
Heidari, N
Oxelman, B
Conflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in Silene
title Conflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in Silene
title_full Conflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in Silene
title_fullStr Conflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in Silene
title_full_unstemmed Conflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in Silene
title_short Conflicting phylogenetic signals in the SlX1/Y1 gene in Silene
title_sort conflicting phylogenetic signals in the slx1 y1 gene in silene
work_keys_str_mv AT rautenberga conflictingphylogeneticsignalsintheslx1y1geneinsilene
AT filatovd conflictingphylogeneticsignalsintheslx1y1geneinsilene
AT svennbladb conflictingphylogeneticsignalsintheslx1y1geneinsilene
AT heidarin conflictingphylogeneticsignalsintheslx1y1geneinsilene
AT oxelmanb conflictingphylogeneticsignalsintheslx1y1geneinsilene