Better minds, better morals: a procedural guide to better judgment
Making more moral decisions – an uncontroversial goal, if ever there was one. But how to go about it? In this article, we offer a practical guide on ways to promote good judgment in our personal and professional lives. We will do this not by outlining what the good life consists in or which values w...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Pennsylvania State University Press
2017
|
| _version_ | 1826277824724467712 |
|---|---|
| author | Schaefer, G Savulescu, J |
| author_facet | Schaefer, G Savulescu, J |
| author_sort | Schaefer, G |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Making more moral decisions – an uncontroversial goal, if ever there was one. But how to go about it? In this article, we offer a practical guide on ways to promote good judgment in our personal and professional lives. We will do this not by outlining what the good life consists in or which values we should accept. Rather, we offer a theory of procedural reliability: a set of dimensions of thought that are generally conducive to good moral reasoning. At the end of the day, we all have to decide for ourselves what is good and bad, right and wrong. The best way to ensure we make the right choices is to ensure the procedures we’re employing are sound and reliable. We identify four broad categories of judgment to be targeted – cognitive, selfmanagement, motivational and interpersonal. Specific factors within each category are further delineated, with a total of 14 factors to be discussed. For each, we will go through the reasons it generally leads to more morally reliable decision-making, how various thinkers have historically addressed the topic, and the insights of recent research that can offer new ways to promote good reasoning. The result is a wide-ranging survey that contains practical advice on how to make better choices. Finally, we relate this to the project of transhumanism and prudential decision-making. We argue that transhumans will employ better moral procedures like these. We also argue that the same virtues will enable us to take better control of our own lives, enhancing our responsibility and enabling us to lead better lives from the prudential perspective. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:34:43Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:6d411220-5fc5-4d65-a510-493b0fc776ba |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:34:43Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Pennsylvania State University Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:6d411220-5fc5-4d65-a510-493b0fc776ba2022-03-26T19:16:41ZBetter minds, better morals: a procedural guide to better judgmentJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6d411220-5fc5-4d65-a510-493b0fc776baSymplectic Elements at OxfordPennsylvania State University Press2017Schaefer, GSavulescu, JMaking more moral decisions – an uncontroversial goal, if ever there was one. But how to go about it? In this article, we offer a practical guide on ways to promote good judgment in our personal and professional lives. We will do this not by outlining what the good life consists in or which values we should accept. Rather, we offer a theory of procedural reliability: a set of dimensions of thought that are generally conducive to good moral reasoning. At the end of the day, we all have to decide for ourselves what is good and bad, right and wrong. The best way to ensure we make the right choices is to ensure the procedures we’re employing are sound and reliable. We identify four broad categories of judgment to be targeted – cognitive, selfmanagement, motivational and interpersonal. Specific factors within each category are further delineated, with a total of 14 factors to be discussed. For each, we will go through the reasons it generally leads to more morally reliable decision-making, how various thinkers have historically addressed the topic, and the insights of recent research that can offer new ways to promote good reasoning. The result is a wide-ranging survey that contains practical advice on how to make better choices. Finally, we relate this to the project of transhumanism and prudential decision-making. We argue that transhumans will employ better moral procedures like these. We also argue that the same virtues will enable us to take better control of our own lives, enhancing our responsibility and enabling us to lead better lives from the prudential perspective. |
| spellingShingle | Schaefer, G Savulescu, J Better minds, better morals: a procedural guide to better judgment |
| title | Better minds, better morals: a procedural guide to better judgment |
| title_full | Better minds, better morals: a procedural guide to better judgment |
| title_fullStr | Better minds, better morals: a procedural guide to better judgment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Better minds, better morals: a procedural guide to better judgment |
| title_short | Better minds, better morals: a procedural guide to better judgment |
| title_sort | better minds better morals a procedural guide to better judgment |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT schaeferg bettermindsbettermoralsaproceduralguidetobetterjudgment AT savulescuj bettermindsbettermoralsaproceduralguidetobetterjudgment |