The scyther tool: Verification, falsification, and analysis of security protocols - Tool paper
<p>With the rise of the Internet and other open networks, a large number of security protocols have been developed and deployed in order to provide secure communication. The analysis of such security protocols has turned out to be extremely diffocult for humans, as witnessed by the fact that m...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book section |
| Published: |
Springer
2008
|
| _version_ | 1797074452101464064 |
|---|---|
| author | Cremers, C |
| author_facet | Cremers, C |
| author_sort | Cremers, C |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p>With the rise of the Internet and other open networks, a large number of security protocols have been developed and deployed in order to provide secure communication. The analysis of such security protocols has turned out to be extremely diffocult for humans, as witnessed by the fact that many protocols were found to be awed after deployment. This has driven the research in formal analysis of security protocols. Unfortunately, there are no effective approaches yet for constructing correct and efficient protocols, and work on concise formal logics that might allow one to easily prove that a protocol is correct in a formal model, is still ongoing. The most effective approach so far has been automated falsification or verification of such protocols with state-of-the-art tools such as ProVerif [1] or the Avispa tools [2]. These tools have shown to be effective at finding attacks on protocols (Avispa) or establishing correctness of protocols (ProVerif ).</p> <p>With the rise of the Internet and other open networks, a large number of security protocols have been developed and deployed in order to provide secure communication. The analysis of such security protocols has turned out to be extremely difficult for humans, as witnessed by the fact that many protocols were found to be awed after deployment. This has driven the research in formal analysis of security protocols. Unfortunately, there are no effective approaches yet for constructing correct and efficient protocols, and work on concise formal logics that might allow one to easily prove that a protocol is correct in a formal model, is still ongoing. The most effective approach so far has been automated falsification or verification of such protocols with state-of-the-art tools such as ProVerif [1] or the Avispa tools [2]. These tools have shown to be effective at finding attacks on protocols (Avispa) or establishing correctness of protocols (ProVerif ).</p> <p>Scyther is based on a pattern refinement algorithm, providing concise representations of (infinite) sets of traces. This allows the tool to assist in the analysis of classes of attacks and possible protocol behaviours, or to prove correctness for an unbounded number of protocol sessions. The tool has been successfully applied in both research and teaching.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:36:22Z |
| format | Book section |
| id | oxford-uuid:6dcd4806-2d6e-4c06-82aa-83174cb9d2ba |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:36:22Z |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:6dcd4806-2d6e-4c06-82aa-83174cb9d2ba2022-03-26T19:20:08ZThe scyther tool: Verification, falsification, and analysis of security protocols - Tool paperBook sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248uuid:6dcd4806-2d6e-4c06-82aa-83174cb9d2baSymplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer2008Cremers, C<p>With the rise of the Internet and other open networks, a large number of security protocols have been developed and deployed in order to provide secure communication. The analysis of such security protocols has turned out to be extremely diffocult for humans, as witnessed by the fact that many protocols were found to be awed after deployment. This has driven the research in formal analysis of security protocols. Unfortunately, there are no effective approaches yet for constructing correct and efficient protocols, and work on concise formal logics that might allow one to easily prove that a protocol is correct in a formal model, is still ongoing. The most effective approach so far has been automated falsification or verification of such protocols with state-of-the-art tools such as ProVerif [1] or the Avispa tools [2]. These tools have shown to be effective at finding attacks on protocols (Avispa) or establishing correctness of protocols (ProVerif ).</p> <p>With the rise of the Internet and other open networks, a large number of security protocols have been developed and deployed in order to provide secure communication. The analysis of such security protocols has turned out to be extremely difficult for humans, as witnessed by the fact that many protocols were found to be awed after deployment. This has driven the research in formal analysis of security protocols. Unfortunately, there are no effective approaches yet for constructing correct and efficient protocols, and work on concise formal logics that might allow one to easily prove that a protocol is correct in a formal model, is still ongoing. The most effective approach so far has been automated falsification or verification of such protocols with state-of-the-art tools such as ProVerif [1] or the Avispa tools [2]. These tools have shown to be effective at finding attacks on protocols (Avispa) or establishing correctness of protocols (ProVerif ).</p> <p>Scyther is based on a pattern refinement algorithm, providing concise representations of (infinite) sets of traces. This allows the tool to assist in the analysis of classes of attacks and possible protocol behaviours, or to prove correctness for an unbounded number of protocol sessions. The tool has been successfully applied in both research and teaching.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Cremers, C The scyther tool: Verification, falsification, and analysis of security protocols - Tool paper |
| title | The scyther tool: Verification, falsification, and analysis of security protocols - Tool paper |
| title_full | The scyther tool: Verification, falsification, and analysis of security protocols - Tool paper |
| title_fullStr | The scyther tool: Verification, falsification, and analysis of security protocols - Tool paper |
| title_full_unstemmed | The scyther tool: Verification, falsification, and analysis of security protocols - Tool paper |
| title_short | The scyther tool: Verification, falsification, and analysis of security protocols - Tool paper |
| title_sort | scyther tool verification falsification and analysis of security protocols tool paper |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cremersc thescythertoolverificationfalsificationandanalysisofsecurityprotocolstoolpaper AT cremersc scythertoolverificationfalsificationandanalysisofsecurityprotocolstoolpaper |