The politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, India
In this paper, we examine the on-the-ground realities of upstream-downstream negotiations and transactions over ecosystem services. We explore the engagement, negotiation, implementation, and postimplementation phases of a “reciprocal water access” (RWA) agreement between village commun...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2016
|
| _version_ | 1797074459446738944 |
|---|---|
| author | Hope, R Kovacs, E Kumar, C Agarwal, C Adams, W Vira, B |
| author_facet | Hope, R Kovacs, E Kumar, C Agarwal, C Adams, W Vira, B |
| author_sort | Hope, R |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In this paper, we examine the on-the-ground realities of upstream-downstream negotiations and transactions over ecosystem services. We explore the engagement, negotiation, implementation, and postimplementation phases of a “reciprocal water access” (RWA) agreement between village communities and municipal water users at Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India. We aim to highlight how external actors drove the payments for ecosystem services agenda through a series of facilitation and research engagements, which were pivotal to the RWA’s adoption, and how the agreement fared once external agents withdrew. In the postimplementation period, the RWA agreement continues to be upheld by upstream communities amidst evolving, competing land-use changes and claims. The introduction of cash payments for environmental services for forest-water relationships has given rise to multifaceted difficulties for the upstream hamlets, which has impeded the functionality of their forest management committee. Upstream communities’ formal rights and abilities to control and manage their resources are dynamic and need strengthening and assurance; these developments result in fluctuating transaction and opportunity costs not originally envisaged by the RWA agreement. The paper demonstrates the importance of an explicit understanding of the local politics of negotiation and implementation to determine the effectiveness of compensationbased mechanisms for the supply of ecosystem services. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:36:28Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:6dd6d81d-ec1e-43a5-836b-282925218cb4 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:36:28Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Resilience Alliance |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:6dd6d81d-ec1e-43a5-836b-282925218cb42022-03-26T19:20:24ZThe politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, IndiaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6dd6d81d-ec1e-43a5-836b-282925218cb4Symplectic Elements at OxfordResilience Alliance2016Hope, RKovacs, EKumar, CAgarwal, CAdams, WVira, BIn this paper, we examine the on-the-ground realities of upstream-downstream negotiations and transactions over ecosystem services. We explore the engagement, negotiation, implementation, and postimplementation phases of a “reciprocal water access” (RWA) agreement between village communities and municipal water users at Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India. We aim to highlight how external actors drove the payments for ecosystem services agenda through a series of facilitation and research engagements, which were pivotal to the RWA’s adoption, and how the agreement fared once external agents withdrew. In the postimplementation period, the RWA agreement continues to be upheld by upstream communities amidst evolving, competing land-use changes and claims. The introduction of cash payments for environmental services for forest-water relationships has given rise to multifaceted difficulties for the upstream hamlets, which has impeded the functionality of their forest management committee. Upstream communities’ formal rights and abilities to control and manage their resources are dynamic and need strengthening and assurance; these developments result in fluctuating transaction and opportunity costs not originally envisaged by the RWA agreement. The paper demonstrates the importance of an explicit understanding of the local politics of negotiation and implementation to determine the effectiveness of compensationbased mechanisms for the supply of ecosystem services. |
| spellingShingle | Hope, R Kovacs, E Kumar, C Agarwal, C Adams, W Vira, B The politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, India |
| title | The politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, India |
| title_full | The politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, India |
| title_fullStr | The politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, India |
| title_full_unstemmed | The politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, India |
| title_short | The politics of negotiation and implementation: a reciprocal water access agreement in the Himalayan foothills, India |
| title_sort | politics of negotiation and implementation a reciprocal water access agreement in the himalayan foothills india |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hoper thepoliticsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT kovacse thepoliticsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT kumarc thepoliticsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT agarwalc thepoliticsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT adamsw thepoliticsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT virab thepoliticsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT hoper politicsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT kovacse politicsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT kumarc politicsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT agarwalc politicsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT adamsw politicsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia AT virab politicsofnegotiationandimplementationareciprocalwateraccessagreementinthehimalayanfoothillsindia |