Mundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Co-Production of Citizenship

The internet’s potential for political mobilization has been highlighted for more than a decade, but we know little about what particular kinds of information and communication technologies are most important when it comes to getting people involved in politics and what this means for the active exe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nielsen, R
Format: Journal article
Published: 2011
_version_ 1797074496157384704
author Nielsen, R
author_facet Nielsen, R
author_sort Nielsen, R
collection OXFORD
description The internet’s potential for political mobilization has been highlighted for more than a decade, but we know little about what particular kinds of information and communication technologies are most important when it comes to getting people involved in politics and what this means for the active exercise of engaged citizenship. On the basis of ethnographic research in two congressional campaigns in the United States, I will argue here that specific mundane internet tools (like email) are much more deeply integrated into mobilizing practices today than emerging tools (like social networking sites) and specialized tools (like campaign websites). Campaigns’ reliance on mundane internet tools challenges the prevalent idea that sophisticated “hypermedia” turn people into “managed citizens.” Instead I suggest we theorize internet-assisted activism as a process for the coproduction of citizenship and recognize how dependent even well-funded political organizations are on the wider built communications environment and today’s relatively open internet.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:37:02Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6e023966-2faa-42ce-8fc7-4273f9832a9d
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:37:02Z
publishDate 2011
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6e023966-2faa-42ce-8fc7-4273f9832a9d2022-03-26T19:21:32ZMundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Co-Production of CitizenshipJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6e023966-2faa-42ce-8fc7-4273f9832a9dSocial Sciences Division - Daisy2011Nielsen, RThe internet’s potential for political mobilization has been highlighted for more than a decade, but we know little about what particular kinds of information and communication technologies are most important when it comes to getting people involved in politics and what this means for the active exercise of engaged citizenship. On the basis of ethnographic research in two congressional campaigns in the United States, I will argue here that specific mundane internet tools (like email) are much more deeply integrated into mobilizing practices today than emerging tools (like social networking sites) and specialized tools (like campaign websites). Campaigns’ reliance on mundane internet tools challenges the prevalent idea that sophisticated “hypermedia” turn people into “managed citizens.” Instead I suggest we theorize internet-assisted activism as a process for the coproduction of citizenship and recognize how dependent even well-funded political organizations are on the wider built communications environment and today’s relatively open internet.
spellingShingle Nielsen, R
Mundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Co-Production of Citizenship
title Mundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Co-Production of Citizenship
title_full Mundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Co-Production of Citizenship
title_fullStr Mundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Co-Production of Citizenship
title_full_unstemmed Mundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Co-Production of Citizenship
title_short Mundane Internet Tools, Mobilizing Practices, and the Co-Production of Citizenship
title_sort mundane internet tools mobilizing practices and the co production of citizenship
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenr mundaneinternettoolsmobilizingpracticesandthecoproductionofcitizenship