Environmental change, if unaccounted, prevents detection of cryptic evolution in a wild population

Detecting contemporary evolution requires demonstrating that genetic change has occurred. Mixed effects models allow estimation of quantitative genetic parameters and are widely used to study evolution in wild populations. However, predictions of evolution based on these parameters frequently fail t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Potter, T, Bassar, RD, Bentzen, P, Ruell, EW, Torres-Dowdall, J, Handelsman, CA, Ghalambor, CK, Travis, J, Reznick, DN, Coulson, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: University of Chicago Press 2020
_version_ 1797074498584838144
author Potter, T
Bassar, RD
Bentzen, P
Ruell, EW
Torres-Dowdall, J
Handelsman, CA
Ghalambor, CK
Travis, J
Reznick, DN
Coulson, T
author_facet Potter, T
Bassar, RD
Bentzen, P
Ruell, EW
Torres-Dowdall, J
Handelsman, CA
Ghalambor, CK
Travis, J
Reznick, DN
Coulson, T
author_sort Potter, T
collection OXFORD
description Detecting contemporary evolution requires demonstrating that genetic change has occurred. Mixed effects models allow estimation of quantitative genetic parameters and are widely used to study evolution in wild populations. However, predictions of evolution based on these parameters frequently fail to match observations. Here, we applied three commonly used quantitative genetic approaches to predict the evolution of size at maturity in a wild population of Trinidadian guppies. Crucially, we tested our predictions against evolutionary change observed in common-garden experiments performed on samples from the same population. We show that standard quantitative genetic models underestimated or failed to detect the cryptic evolution of this trait as demonstrated by the common-garden experiments. The models failed because (1) size at maturity and fitness both decreased with increases in population density, (2) offspring experienced higher population densities than their parents, and (3) selection on size was strongest at high densities. When we accounted for environmental change, predictions better matched observations in the common-garden experiments, although substantial uncertainty remained. Our results demonstrate that predictions of evolution are unreliable if environmental change is not appropriately captured in models.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:37:04Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6e046104-cc52-462a-a7ff-9725d57113f9
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:37:04Z
publishDate 2020
publisher University of Chicago Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6e046104-cc52-462a-a7ff-9725d57113f92022-03-26T19:21:40ZEnvironmental change, if unaccounted, prevents detection of cryptic evolution in a wild populationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6e046104-cc52-462a-a7ff-9725d57113f9EnglishSymplectic ElementsUniversity of Chicago Press2020Potter, TBassar, RDBentzen, PRuell, EWTorres-Dowdall, JHandelsman, CAGhalambor, CKTravis, JReznick, DNCoulson, TDetecting contemporary evolution requires demonstrating that genetic change has occurred. Mixed effects models allow estimation of quantitative genetic parameters and are widely used to study evolution in wild populations. However, predictions of evolution based on these parameters frequently fail to match observations. Here, we applied three commonly used quantitative genetic approaches to predict the evolution of size at maturity in a wild population of Trinidadian guppies. Crucially, we tested our predictions against evolutionary change observed in common-garden experiments performed on samples from the same population. We show that standard quantitative genetic models underestimated or failed to detect the cryptic evolution of this trait as demonstrated by the common-garden experiments. The models failed because (1) size at maturity and fitness both decreased with increases in population density, (2) offspring experienced higher population densities than their parents, and (3) selection on size was strongest at high densities. When we accounted for environmental change, predictions better matched observations in the common-garden experiments, although substantial uncertainty remained. Our results demonstrate that predictions of evolution are unreliable if environmental change is not appropriately captured in models.
spellingShingle Potter, T
Bassar, RD
Bentzen, P
Ruell, EW
Torres-Dowdall, J
Handelsman, CA
Ghalambor, CK
Travis, J
Reznick, DN
Coulson, T
Environmental change, if unaccounted, prevents detection of cryptic evolution in a wild population
title Environmental change, if unaccounted, prevents detection of cryptic evolution in a wild population
title_full Environmental change, if unaccounted, prevents detection of cryptic evolution in a wild population
title_fullStr Environmental change, if unaccounted, prevents detection of cryptic evolution in a wild population
title_full_unstemmed Environmental change, if unaccounted, prevents detection of cryptic evolution in a wild population
title_short Environmental change, if unaccounted, prevents detection of cryptic evolution in a wild population
title_sort environmental change if unaccounted prevents detection of cryptic evolution in a wild population
work_keys_str_mv AT pottert environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation
AT bassarrd environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation
AT bentzenp environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation
AT ruellew environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation
AT torresdowdallj environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation
AT handelsmanca environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation
AT ghalamborck environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation
AT travisj environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation
AT reznickdn environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation
AT coulsont environmentalchangeifunaccountedpreventsdetectionofcrypticevolutioninawildpopulation