Gauging the global impacts of the 'Panama Papers' three years later

The last decade has seen rising interest in developing ways to measure the impacts of investigative journalism. This factsheet offers a comparative analysis of outcomes of the 'Panama Papers’ investigation of 2016, which ultimately involved more than 500 reporters working in more than 80 countr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Graves, L, Shabbir, N
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 2019
_version_ 1826315239572897792
author Graves, L
Shabbir, N
author_facet Graves, L
Shabbir, N
author_sort Graves, L
collection OXFORD
description The last decade has seen rising interest in developing ways to measure the impacts of investigative journalism. This factsheet offers a comparative analysis of outcomes of the 'Panama Papers’ investigation of 2016, which ultimately involved more than 500 reporters working in more than 80 countries. With a content analysis of impacts self-reported by journalists over three years, we show that ‘deliberative’ outcomes indicating official discussion or investigation have been the most common impact, evident in 45 percent of jurisdictions tracked; we find evidence of ‘individualistic’ outcomes involving accountability for specific people or companies in a third, and of 'substantive’ legal or policy change in 18 percent. We also evidence of backlash against reporters nearly as often as substantive reforms, though rarely in the same countries. Our analysis shows that major investigative reports may continue to have significant impacts years after publication, and that substantive reforms require time to take shape.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:37:36Z
format Report
id oxford-uuid:6e3081b1-5a91-4ddc-a40b-ad8129591f96
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-09T03:22:16Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6e3081b1-5a91-4ddc-a40b-ad8129591f962024-11-18T14:50:37ZGauging the global impacts of the 'Panama Papers' three years laterReporthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fcuuid:6e3081b1-5a91-4ddc-a40b-ad8129591f96EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordReuters Institute for the Study of Journalism2019Graves, LShabbir, NThe last decade has seen rising interest in developing ways to measure the impacts of investigative journalism. This factsheet offers a comparative analysis of outcomes of the 'Panama Papers’ investigation of 2016, which ultimately involved more than 500 reporters working in more than 80 countries. With a content analysis of impacts self-reported by journalists over three years, we show that ‘deliberative’ outcomes indicating official discussion or investigation have been the most common impact, evident in 45 percent of jurisdictions tracked; we find evidence of ‘individualistic’ outcomes involving accountability for specific people or companies in a third, and of 'substantive’ legal or policy change in 18 percent. We also evidence of backlash against reporters nearly as often as substantive reforms, though rarely in the same countries. Our analysis shows that major investigative reports may continue to have significant impacts years after publication, and that substantive reforms require time to take shape.
spellingShingle Graves, L
Shabbir, N
Gauging the global impacts of the 'Panama Papers' three years later
title Gauging the global impacts of the 'Panama Papers' three years later
title_full Gauging the global impacts of the 'Panama Papers' three years later
title_fullStr Gauging the global impacts of the 'Panama Papers' three years later
title_full_unstemmed Gauging the global impacts of the 'Panama Papers' three years later
title_short Gauging the global impacts of the 'Panama Papers' three years later
title_sort gauging the global impacts of the panama papers three years later
work_keys_str_mv AT gravesl gaugingtheglobalimpactsofthepanamapapersthreeyearslater
AT shabbirn gaugingtheglobalimpactsofthepanamapapersthreeyearslater