Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review

This literature review examines social scientific evidence regarding the existence, causes, and effects of online echo chambers in the context of concerns about digital platforms contributing to polarisation in our societies generally, and in relation to scientific topics, specifically. The scholars...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ross Arguedas, A, Robertson, C, Fletcher, R, Nielsen, R
Format: Report
Language:English
Published: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 2022
_version_ 1811139166579195904
author Ross Arguedas, A
Robertson, C
Fletcher, R
Nielsen, R
author_facet Ross Arguedas, A
Robertson, C
Fletcher, R
Nielsen, R
author_sort Ross Arguedas, A
collection OXFORD
description This literature review examines social scientific evidence regarding the existence, causes, and effects of online echo chambers in the context of concerns about digital platforms contributing to polarisation in our societies generally, and in relation to scientific topics, specifically. The scholarship suggests echo chambers are much less widespread than is commonly assumed, finds no support for the filter bubble hypothesis, and offers a mixed picture on polarisation and the role of news and media use in contributing to polarisation, especially given limited research outside of the United States. Evidence about echo chambers around public discussions of science is limited; however, research on science communication points to the important role of self-selection, elite cues, and small, highly active communities in shaping these debates. These findings are important as terms like echo chambers are widely used in public and policy debates, sometimes in disparate ways, and not always aligned with the evidence.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:37:40Z
format Report
id oxford-uuid:6e357e97-7b16-450a-a827-a92c93729a08
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:01:46Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6e357e97-7b16-450a-a827-a92c93729a082024-04-24T15:18:30ZEcho chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review Reporthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fcuuid:6e357e97-7b16-450a-a827-a92c93729a08EnglishSymplectic ElementsReuters Institute for the Study of Journalism2022Ross Arguedas, ARobertson, CFletcher, RNielsen, RThis literature review examines social scientific evidence regarding the existence, causes, and effects of online echo chambers in the context of concerns about digital platforms contributing to polarisation in our societies generally, and in relation to scientific topics, specifically. The scholarship suggests echo chambers are much less widespread than is commonly assumed, finds no support for the filter bubble hypothesis, and offers a mixed picture on polarisation and the role of news and media use in contributing to polarisation, especially given limited research outside of the United States. Evidence about echo chambers around public discussions of science is limited; however, research on science communication points to the important role of self-selection, elite cues, and small, highly active communities in shaping these debates. These findings are important as terms like echo chambers are widely used in public and policy debates, sometimes in disparate ways, and not always aligned with the evidence.
spellingShingle Ross Arguedas, A
Robertson, C
Fletcher, R
Nielsen, R
Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review
title Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review
title_full Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review
title_fullStr Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review
title_short Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review
title_sort echo chambers filter bubbles and polarisation a literature review
work_keys_str_mv AT rossarguedasa echochambersfilterbubblesandpolarisationaliteraturereview
AT robertsonc echochambersfilterbubblesandpolarisationaliteraturereview
AT fletcherr echochambersfilterbubblesandpolarisationaliteraturereview
AT nielsenr echochambersfilterbubblesandpolarisationaliteraturereview