The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy

Evidence from the Transitional Justice Data Base reveals which transitional justice mechanisms and combinations of mechanisms positively or negatively affect human rights and democracy. This article demonstrates that specific combinations of mechanisms-trials and amnesties; and trials, amnesties, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olsen, T, Payne, L, Reiter, A
Format: Journal article
Published: Johns Hopkins University Press 2010
_version_ 1826278021493948416
author Olsen, T
Payne, L
Reiter, A
author_facet Olsen, T
Payne, L
Reiter, A
author_sort Olsen, T
collection OXFORD
description Evidence from the Transitional Justice Data Base reveals which transitional justice mechanisms and combinations of mechanisms positively or negatively affect human rights and democracy. This article demonstrates that specific combinations of mechanisms-trials and amnesties; and trials, amnesties, and truth commissions-generate improvements in those two political goals. The findings support a justice balance approach to transitional justice: trials provide accountability and amnesties provide stability, advancing democracy and respect for human rights. The project further illustrates that, all else being equal, truth commissions alone have a negative impact on the two political objectives but contribute positively when combined with trials and amnesty.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:37:42Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6e38b8c0-9ddb-419d-b497-6925379e9a92
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:37:42Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Johns Hopkins University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6e38b8c0-9ddb-419d-b497-6925379e9a922022-03-26T19:23:03ZThe justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6e38b8c0-9ddb-419d-b497-6925379e9a92Symplectic Elements at OxfordJohns Hopkins University Press2010Olsen, TPayne, LReiter, AEvidence from the Transitional Justice Data Base reveals which transitional justice mechanisms and combinations of mechanisms positively or negatively affect human rights and democracy. This article demonstrates that specific combinations of mechanisms-trials and amnesties; and trials, amnesties, and truth commissions-generate improvements in those two political goals. The findings support a justice balance approach to transitional justice: trials provide accountability and amnesties provide stability, advancing democracy and respect for human rights. The project further illustrates that, all else being equal, truth commissions alone have a negative impact on the two political objectives but contribute positively when combined with trials and amnesty.
spellingShingle Olsen, T
Payne, L
Reiter, A
The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy
title The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy
title_full The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy
title_fullStr The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy
title_full_unstemmed The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy
title_short The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy
title_sort justice balance when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy
work_keys_str_mv AT olsent thejusticebalancewhentransitionaljusticeimproveshumanrightsanddemocracy
AT paynel thejusticebalancewhentransitionaljusticeimproveshumanrightsanddemocracy
AT reitera thejusticebalancewhentransitionaljusticeimproveshumanrightsanddemocracy
AT olsent justicebalancewhentransitionaljusticeimproveshumanrightsanddemocracy
AT paynel justicebalancewhentransitionaljusticeimproveshumanrightsanddemocracy
AT reitera justicebalancewhentransitionaljusticeimproveshumanrightsanddemocracy