On coalescence time in graphs–when is coalescing as fast as meeting?

<p>Coalescing random walks is a fundamental distributed process, where a set of particles perform independent discrete-time random walks on an undirected graph. Whenever two or more particles meet at a given node, they merge and continue as a single random walk. The&nbsp;<em>coalesce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanade, V, Mallmann-Trenn, F, Sauerwald, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Association for Computing Machinery 2023
Description
Summary:<p>Coalescing random walks is a fundamental distributed process, where a set of particles perform independent discrete-time random walks on an undirected graph. Whenever two or more particles meet at a given node, they merge and continue as a single random walk. The&nbsp;<em>coalescence time</em>&nbsp;is defined as the expected time until only one particle remains, starting from one particle at every node. Despite recent progress such as by Cooper et&nbsp;al. [14] and Cooper et&nbsp;al. [19], the coalescence time for graphs such as binary trees,&nbsp;<em>d</em>-dimensional tori, hypercubes and more generally, vertex-transitive graphs, remains unresolved.</p> <p>We provide a powerful toolkit that results in tight bounds for various topologies including the aforementioned ones. The meeting time is defined as the worst-case expected time required for two random walks to arrive at the same node at the same time. As a general result, we establish that for graphs whose meeting time is only marginally larger than the mixing time (a factor of log&thinsp;<sup>2</sup><em>n</em>), the coalescence time of&nbsp;<em>n</em>&nbsp;random walks equals the meeting time up to constant factors. This upper bound is complemented by the construction of a graph family demonstrating that this result is the best possible up to constant factors. Finally, we prove a tight worst case bound for the coalescence time of&nbsp;<em>O</em>(<em>n</em><sup>3</sup>). By duality, our results yield identical bounds on the voter model.</p> <p>Our techniques also yield a new bound on the hitting time and cover time of regular graphs, improving and tightening previous results by Broder and Karlin [12], as well as those by Aldous and Fill [2].</p>