Personalised randomised controlled trial designs – a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections

Antimicrobial resistance is impacting treatment decisions for, and patient outcomes from, bacterial infections worldwide, with particular threats from infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumanii, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Numerous areas of clinical uncertainty su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Walker, AS, White, IR, Turner, R, Yang, HL, Wen, YT, White, N, Sharland, M, Thwaites, G
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021
_version_ 1797074683883945984
author Walker, AS
White, IR
Turner, R
Yang, HL
Wen, YT
White, N
Sharland, M
Thwaites, G
author_facet Walker, AS
White, IR
Turner, R
Yang, HL
Wen, YT
White, N
Sharland, M
Thwaites, G
author_sort Walker, AS
collection OXFORD
description Antimicrobial resistance is impacting treatment decisions for, and patient outcomes from, bacterial infections worldwide, with particular threats from infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumanii, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Numerous areas of clinical uncertainty surround the treatment of these highly resistant infections, yet substantial obstacles exist to the design and conduct of treatment trials for carbapenem-resistant bacterial infections. These include the lack of a widely acceptable optimised standard of care and control regimens, varying antimicrobial susceptibilities and clinical contraindications making specific intervention regimens infeasible, and diagnostic and recruitment challenges. The current single comparator trials are not designed to answer the urgent public health question, identified as a high priority by WHO, of what are the best regimens out of the available options that will significantly reduce morbidity, costs, and mortality. This scenario has an analogy in network meta-analysis, which compares multiple treatments in an evidence synthesis to rank the best of a set of available treatments. To address these obstacles, we propose extending the network meta-analysis approach to individual randomisation of patients. We refer to this approach as a Personalised RAndomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical) design that compares multiple treatments in an evidence synthesis, to identify, overall, which is the best treatment out of a set of available treatments to recommend, or how these different treatments rank against each other. In this Personal View, we summarise the design principles of personalised randomised controlled trial designs. Specifically, of a network of different potential regimens for life-threatening carbapenem-resistant infections, each patient would be randomly assigned only to regimens considered clinically reasonable for that patient at that time, incorporating antimicrobial susceptibility, toxicity profile, pharmacometric properties, availability, and physician assessment. Analysis can use both direct and indirect comparisons across the network, analogous to network meta-analysis. This new trial design will maximise the relevance of the findings to each individual patient, and enable the top-ranked regimens from any personalised randomisation list to be identified, in terms of both efficacy and safety.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:39:48Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6ee87cf4-222c-413a-8de2-98949d603633
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:39:48Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6ee87cf4-222c-413a-8de2-98949d6036332022-03-26T19:27:27ZPersonalised randomised controlled trial designs – a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infectionsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6ee87cf4-222c-413a-8de2-98949d603633EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2021Walker, ASWhite, IRTurner, RYang, HLWen, YTWhite, NSharland, MThwaites, GAntimicrobial resistance is impacting treatment decisions for, and patient outcomes from, bacterial infections worldwide, with particular threats from infections with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumanii, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Numerous areas of clinical uncertainty surround the treatment of these highly resistant infections, yet substantial obstacles exist to the design and conduct of treatment trials for carbapenem-resistant bacterial infections. These include the lack of a widely acceptable optimised standard of care and control regimens, varying antimicrobial susceptibilities and clinical contraindications making specific intervention regimens infeasible, and diagnostic and recruitment challenges. The current single comparator trials are not designed to answer the urgent public health question, identified as a high priority by WHO, of what are the best regimens out of the available options that will significantly reduce morbidity, costs, and mortality. This scenario has an analogy in network meta-analysis, which compares multiple treatments in an evidence synthesis to rank the best of a set of available treatments. To address these obstacles, we propose extending the network meta-analysis approach to individual randomisation of patients. We refer to this approach as a Personalised RAndomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical) design that compares multiple treatments in an evidence synthesis, to identify, overall, which is the best treatment out of a set of available treatments to recommend, or how these different treatments rank against each other. In this Personal View, we summarise the design principles of personalised randomised controlled trial designs. Specifically, of a network of different potential regimens for life-threatening carbapenem-resistant infections, each patient would be randomly assigned only to regimens considered clinically reasonable for that patient at that time, incorporating antimicrobial susceptibility, toxicity profile, pharmacometric properties, availability, and physician assessment. Analysis can use both direct and indirect comparisons across the network, analogous to network meta-analysis. This new trial design will maximise the relevance of the findings to each individual patient, and enable the top-ranked regimens from any personalised randomisation list to be identified, in terms of both efficacy and safety.
spellingShingle Walker, AS
White, IR
Turner, R
Yang, HL
Wen, YT
White, N
Sharland, M
Thwaites, G
Personalised randomised controlled trial designs – a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections
title Personalised randomised controlled trial designs – a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections
title_full Personalised randomised controlled trial designs – a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections
title_fullStr Personalised randomised controlled trial designs – a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections
title_full_unstemmed Personalised randomised controlled trial designs – a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections
title_short Personalised randomised controlled trial designs – a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections
title_sort personalised randomised controlled trial designs a new paradigm to define optimal treatments for carbapenem resistant infections
work_keys_str_mv AT walkeras personalisedrandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignsanewparadigmtodefineoptimaltreatmentsforcarbapenemresistantinfections
AT whiteir personalisedrandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignsanewparadigmtodefineoptimaltreatmentsforcarbapenemresistantinfections
AT turnerr personalisedrandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignsanewparadigmtodefineoptimaltreatmentsforcarbapenemresistantinfections
AT yanghl personalisedrandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignsanewparadigmtodefineoptimaltreatmentsforcarbapenemresistantinfections
AT wenyt personalisedrandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignsanewparadigmtodefineoptimaltreatmentsforcarbapenemresistantinfections
AT whiten personalisedrandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignsanewparadigmtodefineoptimaltreatmentsforcarbapenemresistantinfections
AT sharlandm personalisedrandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignsanewparadigmtodefineoptimaltreatmentsforcarbapenemresistantinfections
AT thwaitesg personalisedrandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignsanewparadigmtodefineoptimaltreatmentsforcarbapenemresistantinfections