Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave
In the summer 2010 Western Russia was hit by an extraordinary heat wave, with the region experiencing by far the warmest July since records began. Whether and to what extent this event is attributable to anthropogenic climate change is controversial. Dole et al. (2011) report the 2010 Russian heat w...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
2012
|
| _version_ | 1826278193361846272 |
|---|---|
| author | Otto, F Massey, N van Oldenborgh, G Jones, R Allen, MR |
| author_facet | Otto, F Massey, N van Oldenborgh, G Jones, R Allen, MR |
| author_sort | Otto, F |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In the summer 2010 Western Russia was hit by an extraordinary heat wave, with the region experiencing by far the warmest July since records began. Whether and to what extent this event is attributable to anthropogenic climate change is controversial. Dole et al. (2011) report the 2010 Russian heat wave was "mainly natural in origin" whereas Rahmstorf and Coumou (2011) write that with a probability of 80% "the 2010 July heat record would not have occurred" without the large-scale climate warming since 1980, most of which has been attributed to the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas concentrations. The latter explicitly state that their results "contradict those of Dole et al. (2011)." Here we use the results from a large ensemble simulation experiment with an atmospheric general circulation model to show that there is no substantive contradiction between these two papers, in that the same event can be both mostly internally-generated in terms of magnitude and mostly externally-driven in terms of occurrence-probability. The difference in conclusion between these two papers illustrates the importance of specifying precisely what question is being asked in addressing the issue of attribution of individual weather events to external drivers of climate. Copyright 2012 by the American Geophysical Union. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:40:17Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:6f1141fd-7c88-4f64-afd7-c321c932420f |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:40:17Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:6f1141fd-7c88-4f64-afd7-c321c932420f2022-03-26T19:28:24ZReconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat waveJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6f1141fd-7c88-4f64-afd7-c321c932420fSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Otto, FMassey, Nvan Oldenborgh, GJones, RAllen, MRIn the summer 2010 Western Russia was hit by an extraordinary heat wave, with the region experiencing by far the warmest July since records began. Whether and to what extent this event is attributable to anthropogenic climate change is controversial. Dole et al. (2011) report the 2010 Russian heat wave was "mainly natural in origin" whereas Rahmstorf and Coumou (2011) write that with a probability of 80% "the 2010 July heat record would not have occurred" without the large-scale climate warming since 1980, most of which has been attributed to the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas concentrations. The latter explicitly state that their results "contradict those of Dole et al. (2011)." Here we use the results from a large ensemble simulation experiment with an atmospheric general circulation model to show that there is no substantive contradiction between these two papers, in that the same event can be both mostly internally-generated in terms of magnitude and mostly externally-driven in terms of occurrence-probability. The difference in conclusion between these two papers illustrates the importance of specifying precisely what question is being asked in addressing the issue of attribution of individual weather events to external drivers of climate. Copyright 2012 by the American Geophysical Union. |
| spellingShingle | Otto, F Massey, N van Oldenborgh, G Jones, R Allen, MR Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave |
| title | Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave |
| title_full | Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave |
| title_fullStr | Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave |
| title_short | Reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 Russian heat wave |
| title_sort | reconciling two approaches to attribution of the 2010 russian heat wave |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ottof reconcilingtwoapproachestoattributionofthe2010russianheatwave AT masseyn reconcilingtwoapproachestoattributionofthe2010russianheatwave AT vanoldenborghg reconcilingtwoapproachestoattributionofthe2010russianheatwave AT jonesr reconcilingtwoapproachestoattributionofthe2010russianheatwave AT allenmr reconcilingtwoapproachestoattributionofthe2010russianheatwave |