Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of thiazolidinediones, as compared with other oral glucose-lowering medications, in maintaining long-term glycemic control in type 2 diabetes is not known. METHODS: We evaluated rosiglitazone, metformin, and glyburide as initial treatment for recently diagnosed type 2 diabe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kahn, SE, Haffner, S, Heise, M, Herman, W, Holman, R, Jones, N, Kravitz, BG, Lachin, J, O'Neill, M, Zinman, B, Viberti, G
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2006
_version_ 1797074760814821376
author Kahn, SE
Haffner, S
Heise, M
Herman, W
Holman, R
Jones, N
Kravitz, BG
Lachin, J
O'Neill, M
Zinman, B
Viberti, G
author_facet Kahn, SE
Haffner, S
Heise, M
Herman, W
Holman, R
Jones, N
Kravitz, BG
Lachin, J
O'Neill, M
Zinman, B
Viberti, G
author_sort Kahn, SE
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of thiazolidinediones, as compared with other oral glucose-lowering medications, in maintaining long-term glycemic control in type 2 diabetes is not known. METHODS: We evaluated rosiglitazone, metformin, and glyburide as initial treatment for recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial involving 4360 patients. The patients were treated for a median of 4.0 years. The primary outcome was the time to monotherapy failure, which was defined as a confirmed level of fasting plasma glucose of more than 180 mg per deciliter (10.0 mmol per liter), for rosiglitazone, as compared with metformin or glyburide. Prespecified secondary outcomes were levels of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative incidence of monotherapy failure at 5 years of 15% with rosiglitazone, 21% with metformin, and 34% with glyburide. This represents a risk reduction of 32% for rosiglitazone, as compared with metformin, and 63%, as compared with glyburide (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The difference in the durability of the treatment effect was greater between rosiglitazone and glyburide than between rosiglitazone and metformin. Glyburide was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (including congestive heart failure) than was rosiglitazone (P<0.05), and the risk associated with metformin was similar to that with rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone was associated with more weight gain and edema than either metformin or glyburide but with fewer gastrointestinal events than metformin and with less hypoglycemia than glyburide (P<0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The potential risks and benefits, the profile of adverse events, and the costs of these three drugs should all be considered to help inform the choice of pharmacotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279045 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:40:51Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6f42f8c3-b3e3-4eb6-98be-a060f66b24a9
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:40:51Z
publishDate 2006
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6f42f8c3-b3e3-4eb6-98be-a060f66b24a92022-03-26T19:29:33ZGlycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6f42f8c3-b3e3-4eb6-98be-a060f66b24a9EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2006Kahn, SEHaffner, SHeise, MHerman, WHolman, RJones, NKravitz, BGLachin, JO'Neill, MZinman, BViberti, G BACKGROUND: The efficacy of thiazolidinediones, as compared with other oral glucose-lowering medications, in maintaining long-term glycemic control in type 2 diabetes is not known. METHODS: We evaluated rosiglitazone, metformin, and glyburide as initial treatment for recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial involving 4360 patients. The patients were treated for a median of 4.0 years. The primary outcome was the time to monotherapy failure, which was defined as a confirmed level of fasting plasma glucose of more than 180 mg per deciliter (10.0 mmol per liter), for rosiglitazone, as compared with metformin or glyburide. Prespecified secondary outcomes were levels of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative incidence of monotherapy failure at 5 years of 15% with rosiglitazone, 21% with metformin, and 34% with glyburide. This represents a risk reduction of 32% for rosiglitazone, as compared with metformin, and 63%, as compared with glyburide (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The difference in the durability of the treatment effect was greater between rosiglitazone and glyburide than between rosiglitazone and metformin. Glyburide was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (including congestive heart failure) than was rosiglitazone (P<0.05), and the risk associated with metformin was similar to that with rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone was associated with more weight gain and edema than either metformin or glyburide but with fewer gastrointestinal events than metformin and with less hypoglycemia than glyburide (P<0.001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The potential risks and benefits, the profile of adverse events, and the costs of these three drugs should all be considered to help inform the choice of pharmacotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279045 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
spellingShingle Kahn, SE
Haffner, S
Heise, M
Herman, W
Holman, R
Jones, N
Kravitz, BG
Lachin, J
O'Neill, M
Zinman, B
Viberti, G
Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.
title Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.
title_full Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.
title_fullStr Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.
title_full_unstemmed Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.
title_short Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.
title_sort glycemic durability of rosiglitazone metformin or glyburide monotherapy
work_keys_str_mv AT kahnse glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT haffners glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT heisem glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT hermanw glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT holmanr glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT jonesn glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT kravitzbg glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT lachinj glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT oneillm glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT zinmanb glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy
AT vibertig glycemicdurabilityofrosiglitazonemetforminorglyburidemonotherapy