The moral case for sign language education

Here, a moral case is presented as to why sign languages such as Auslan should be made compulsory in general school curricula. Firstly, there are significant benefits that accrue to individuals from learning sign language. Secondly, sign language education is a matter of justice; the normalisation o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowman-Smart, H, Gyngell, C, Morgan, A, Savulescu, J
Format: Journal article
Published: Springer Nature 2019
_version_ 1797074854203097088
author Bowman-Smart, H
Gyngell, C
Morgan, A
Savulescu, J
author_facet Bowman-Smart, H
Gyngell, C
Morgan, A
Savulescu, J
author_sort Bowman-Smart, H
collection OXFORD
description Here, a moral case is presented as to why sign languages such as Auslan should be made compulsory in general school curricula. Firstly, there are significant benefits that accrue to individuals from learning sign language. Secondly, sign language education is a matter of justice; the normalisation of sign language education and use would particularly benefit marginalised groups, such as those living with a communication disability. Finally, the integration of sign languages into the curricula would enable the flourishing of Deaf culture and go some way to resolving the tensions that have arisen from the promotion of oralist education facilitated by technologies such as cochlear implants. There are important reasons to further pursue policy proposals regarding the prioritisation of sign language in school curricula.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:42:14Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6fb9bae0-48b4-42a6-8746-6f6615a0be43
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:42:14Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Nature
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6fb9bae0-48b4-42a6-8746-6f6615a0be432022-03-26T19:32:25ZThe moral case for sign language educationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6fb9bae0-48b4-42a6-8746-6f6615a0be43Symplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer Nature2019Bowman-Smart, HGyngell, CMorgan, ASavulescu, JHere, a moral case is presented as to why sign languages such as Auslan should be made compulsory in general school curricula. Firstly, there are significant benefits that accrue to individuals from learning sign language. Secondly, sign language education is a matter of justice; the normalisation of sign language education and use would particularly benefit marginalised groups, such as those living with a communication disability. Finally, the integration of sign languages into the curricula would enable the flourishing of Deaf culture and go some way to resolving the tensions that have arisen from the promotion of oralist education facilitated by technologies such as cochlear implants. There are important reasons to further pursue policy proposals regarding the prioritisation of sign language in school curricula.
spellingShingle Bowman-Smart, H
Gyngell, C
Morgan, A
Savulescu, J
The moral case for sign language education
title The moral case for sign language education
title_full The moral case for sign language education
title_fullStr The moral case for sign language education
title_full_unstemmed The moral case for sign language education
title_short The moral case for sign language education
title_sort moral case for sign language education
work_keys_str_mv AT bowmansmarth themoralcaseforsignlanguageeducation
AT gyngellc themoralcaseforsignlanguageeducation
AT morgana themoralcaseforsignlanguageeducation
AT savulescuj themoralcaseforsignlanguageeducation
AT bowmansmarth moralcaseforsignlanguageeducation
AT gyngellc moralcaseforsignlanguageeducation
AT morgana moralcaseforsignlanguageeducation
AT savulescuj moralcaseforsignlanguageeducation