Triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitors

OBJECTIVE: New electronic devices offer an opportunity within routine primary care settings for improving the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), which is a common cardiac arrhythmia and a modifiable risk factor for stroke. We aimed to assess the performance of a modified blood pressure (BP) moni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kearley, K, Selwood, M, Van Den Bruel, A, Thompson, M, Mant, D, Hobbs, F, Fitzmaurice, D, Heneghan, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
_version_ 1826278339699015680
author Kearley, K
Selwood, M
Van Den Bruel, A
Thompson, M
Mant, D
Hobbs, F
Fitzmaurice, D
Heneghan, C
author_facet Kearley, K
Selwood, M
Van Den Bruel, A
Thompson, M
Mant, D
Hobbs, F
Fitzmaurice, D
Heneghan, C
author_sort Kearley, K
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVE: New electronic devices offer an opportunity within routine primary care settings for improving the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), which is a common cardiac arrhythmia and a modifiable risk factor for stroke. We aimed to assess the performance of a modified blood pressure (BP) monitor and two single-lead ECG devices, as diagnostic triage tests for the detection of AF. SETTING: 6 General Practices in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 1000 ambulatory patients aged 75 years and over. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparative diagnostic accuracy of modified BP monitor and single-lead ECG devices, compared to reference standard of 12-lead ECG, independently interpreted by cardiologists. RESULTS: A total of 79 participants (7.9%) had AF diagnosed by 12-lead ECG. All three devices had a high sensitivity (93.9-98.7%) and are useful for ruling out AF. WatchBP is a better triage test than Omron autoanalysis because it is more specific-89.7% (95% CI 87.5% to 91.6%) compared to 78.3% (95% CI 73.0% to 82.9%), respectively. This would translate into a lower follow-on ECG rate of 17% to rule in/rule out AF compared to 29.7% with the Omron text message in the study population. The overall specificity of single-lead ECGs analysed by a cardiologist was 94.6% for Omron and 90.1% for Merlin. CONCLUSIONS: WatchBP performs better as a triage test for identifying AF in primary care than the single-lead ECG monitors as it does not require expertise for interpretation and its diagnostic performance is comparable to single-lead ECG analysis by cardiologists. It could be used opportunistically to screen elderly patients for undiagnosed AF at regular intervals and/or during BP measurement.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:42:27Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:6fc99b6e-9d7f-4a92-9a94-27db797bef3d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:42:27Z
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:6fc99b6e-9d7f-4a92-9a94-27db797bef3d2022-03-26T19:32:52ZTriage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitorsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:6fc99b6e-9d7f-4a92-9a94-27db797bef3dEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing Group2014Kearley, KSelwood, MVan Den Bruel, AThompson, MMant, DHobbs, FFitzmaurice, DHeneghan, COBJECTIVE: New electronic devices offer an opportunity within routine primary care settings for improving the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF), which is a common cardiac arrhythmia and a modifiable risk factor for stroke. We aimed to assess the performance of a modified blood pressure (BP) monitor and two single-lead ECG devices, as diagnostic triage tests for the detection of AF. SETTING: 6 General Practices in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: 1000 ambulatory patients aged 75 years and over. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparative diagnostic accuracy of modified BP monitor and single-lead ECG devices, compared to reference standard of 12-lead ECG, independently interpreted by cardiologists. RESULTS: A total of 79 participants (7.9%) had AF diagnosed by 12-lead ECG. All three devices had a high sensitivity (93.9-98.7%) and are useful for ruling out AF. WatchBP is a better triage test than Omron autoanalysis because it is more specific-89.7% (95% CI 87.5% to 91.6%) compared to 78.3% (95% CI 73.0% to 82.9%), respectively. This would translate into a lower follow-on ECG rate of 17% to rule in/rule out AF compared to 29.7% with the Omron text message in the study population. The overall specificity of single-lead ECGs analysed by a cardiologist was 94.6% for Omron and 90.1% for Merlin. CONCLUSIONS: WatchBP performs better as a triage test for identifying AF in primary care than the single-lead ECG monitors as it does not require expertise for interpretation and its diagnostic performance is comparable to single-lead ECG analysis by cardiologists. It could be used opportunistically to screen elderly patients for undiagnosed AF at regular intervals and/or during BP measurement.
spellingShingle Kearley, K
Selwood, M
Van Den Bruel, A
Thompson, M
Mant, D
Hobbs, F
Fitzmaurice, D
Heneghan, C
Triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitors
title Triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitors
title_full Triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitors
title_fullStr Triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitors
title_full_unstemmed Triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitors
title_short Triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care: a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single-lead ECG and modified BP monitors
title_sort triage tests for identifying atrial fibrillation in primary care a diagnostic accuracy study comparing single lead ecg and modified bp monitors
work_keys_str_mv AT kearleyk triagetestsforidentifyingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareadiagnosticaccuracystudycomparingsingleleadecgandmodifiedbpmonitors
AT selwoodm triagetestsforidentifyingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareadiagnosticaccuracystudycomparingsingleleadecgandmodifiedbpmonitors
AT vandenbruela triagetestsforidentifyingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareadiagnosticaccuracystudycomparingsingleleadecgandmodifiedbpmonitors
AT thompsonm triagetestsforidentifyingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareadiagnosticaccuracystudycomparingsingleleadecgandmodifiedbpmonitors
AT mantd triagetestsforidentifyingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareadiagnosticaccuracystudycomparingsingleleadecgandmodifiedbpmonitors
AT hobbsf triagetestsforidentifyingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareadiagnosticaccuracystudycomparingsingleleadecgandmodifiedbpmonitors
AT fitzmauriced triagetestsforidentifyingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareadiagnosticaccuracystudycomparingsingleleadecgandmodifiedbpmonitors
AT heneghanc triagetestsforidentifyingatrialfibrillationinprimarycareadiagnosticaccuracystudycomparingsingleleadecgandmodifiedbpmonitors