Measuring adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review
Objective To describe the measurement of adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA), including the methods of adherence measurement, parameters for assessing adherence and any values used to quantify adherence. Methods A systematic review with search terms relat...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021
|
_version_ | 1797074955124342784 |
---|---|
author | Duong, V Daniel, MS Ferreira, ML Fritsch, CG Hunter, DJ Wang, X Wei, N Nicolson, PJA |
author_facet | Duong, V Daniel, MS Ferreira, ML Fritsch, CG Hunter, DJ Wang, X Wei, N Nicolson, PJA |
author_sort | Duong, V |
collection | OXFORD |
description | Objective
To describe the measurement of adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA), including the methods of adherence measurement, parameters for assessing adherence and any values used to quantify adherence.
Methods
A systematic review with search terms related to knee OA, conservative treatments and adherence was conducted. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42020158188). Seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, SportDiscus, PsychINFO, PEDro) were searched from inception to February 02, 2021. Studies that included unsupervised, conservative treatment(s) for knee OA measuring adherence were eligible. Studies were independently screened for inclusion by two researchers. Data was extracted by one researcher and verified by a second researcher. Extracted data included: study type, population, type of treatment, adherence measurement methods, time-points, recall, parameters and values used to quantify adherence.
Results
Of 5033 references identified, 242 studies comprising of 261 treatments were included in the review. The majority of studies were randomised controlled trials investigating therapeutic exercise (n = 107, 41.0%). The most common adherence measurement across all treatments was through self-reported diary (n = 137, 52.5%) and the most common parameter was assessing the frequency of the treatment (n = 79, 30.3%). Only a small number of studies provided values for quantifying satisfactory adherence (n = 26, 9.3%).
Conclusion
There is a wide variety in the reporting of adherence to conservative treatments for knee OA and standardised methods for measuring and reporting adherence are needed. Developing a tool to measure adherence to conservative treatments for knee OA is a priority.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:43:38Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:702990dd-b16e-45b4-ba09-f7db416a8019 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:43:38Z |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:702990dd-b16e-45b4-ba09-f7db416a80192022-03-26T19:35:22ZMeasuring adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic reviewJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:702990dd-b16e-45b4-ba09-f7db416a8019EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2021Duong, VDaniel, MSFerreira, MLFritsch, CGHunter, DJWang, XWei, NNicolson, PJAObjective To describe the measurement of adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA), including the methods of adherence measurement, parameters for assessing adherence and any values used to quantify adherence. Methods A systematic review with search terms related to knee OA, conservative treatments and adherence was conducted. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42020158188). Seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, SportDiscus, PsychINFO, PEDro) were searched from inception to February 02, 2021. Studies that included unsupervised, conservative treatment(s) for knee OA measuring adherence were eligible. Studies were independently screened for inclusion by two researchers. Data was extracted by one researcher and verified by a second researcher. Extracted data included: study type, population, type of treatment, adherence measurement methods, time-points, recall, parameters and values used to quantify adherence. Results Of 5033 references identified, 242 studies comprising of 261 treatments were included in the review. The majority of studies were randomised controlled trials investigating therapeutic exercise (n = 107, 41.0%). The most common adherence measurement across all treatments was through self-reported diary (n = 137, 52.5%) and the most common parameter was assessing the frequency of the treatment (n = 79, 30.3%). Only a small number of studies provided values for quantifying satisfactory adherence (n = 26, 9.3%). Conclusion There is a wide variety in the reporting of adherence to conservative treatments for knee OA and standardised methods for measuring and reporting adherence are needed. Developing a tool to measure adherence to conservative treatments for knee OA is a priority. |
spellingShingle | Duong, V Daniel, MS Ferreira, ML Fritsch, CG Hunter, DJ Wang, X Wei, N Nicolson, PJA Measuring adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review |
title | Measuring adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review |
title_full | Measuring adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Measuring adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review |
title_short | Measuring adherence to unsupervised, conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review |
title_sort | measuring adherence to unsupervised conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis a systematic review |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duongv measuringadherencetounsupervisedconservativetreatmentforkneeosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT danielms measuringadherencetounsupervisedconservativetreatmentforkneeosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT ferreiraml measuringadherencetounsupervisedconservativetreatmentforkneeosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT fritschcg measuringadherencetounsupervisedconservativetreatmentforkneeosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT hunterdj measuringadherencetounsupervisedconservativetreatmentforkneeosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT wangx measuringadherencetounsupervisedconservativetreatmentforkneeosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT wein measuringadherencetounsupervisedconservativetreatmentforkneeosteoarthritisasystematicreview AT nicolsonpja measuringadherencetounsupervisedconservativetreatmentforkneeosteoarthritisasystematicreview |