Environmental justice and REDD+ safeguards in Laos: lessons from an authoritarian political regime
Balancing agendas for climate mitigation and environmental justice continues to be one of the key challenges in climate change governance mechanisms, such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+). In this paper we apply the three-dimensional environmental justice framework as...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
2021
|
| _version_ | 1826278594501935104 |
|---|---|
| author | Ramcilovic-Suominen, S Carodenuto, S McDermott, C Hiedanpää, J |
| author_facet | Ramcilovic-Suominen, S Carodenuto, S McDermott, C Hiedanpää, J |
| author_sort | Ramcilovic-Suominen, S |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Balancing agendas for climate mitigation and environmental justice continues to be one of the key challenges in climate change governance mechanisms, such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+). In this paper we apply the three-dimensional environmental justice framework as a lens to examine the REDD+ process in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos) and the REDD+ social safeguards. We focus particularly on challenges to justice faced by marginalized communities living in forest frontier areas under an authoritarian regime. Drawing on policy analysis and open-ended interviews across different policy levels, we explore procedural, distributional, and recognitional justice across the REDD+ policy levels in Laos. We find that REDD+ social safeguards have been applied by both donors and state actors in ways that facilitate external control. We underscore how authoritarian regime control over civil society and ethnic minority groups thwarts justice. We also highlight how this political culture and lack of inclusiveness are used by donors and project managers to implement their projects with little political debate. Further obstacles to justice relate to limitations inherent in the REDD+ instrument, including tight schedules for dealing with highly sensitive socio-political issues under social safeguards. These findings echo other research but go further in questioning the adequacy of safeguards to promote justice under a nationally driven REDD+. We highlight the importance of recognition and political context, including aspects such as power relations, self-determination and self-governance of traditional or customary structures, in shaping justice outcomes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:46:15Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:710064b2-77a9-461d-9a34-7c15388686cf |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:46:15Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Springer Nature |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:710064b2-77a9-461d-9a34-7c15388686cf2022-03-26T19:41:05ZEnvironmental justice and REDD+ safeguards in Laos: lessons from an authoritarian political regimeJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:710064b2-77a9-461d-9a34-7c15388686cfEnglishSymplectic ElementsSpringer Nature2021Ramcilovic-Suominen, SCarodenuto, SMcDermott, CHiedanpää, JBalancing agendas for climate mitigation and environmental justice continues to be one of the key challenges in climate change governance mechanisms, such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+). In this paper we apply the three-dimensional environmental justice framework as a lens to examine the REDD+ process in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos) and the REDD+ social safeguards. We focus particularly on challenges to justice faced by marginalized communities living in forest frontier areas under an authoritarian regime. Drawing on policy analysis and open-ended interviews across different policy levels, we explore procedural, distributional, and recognitional justice across the REDD+ policy levels in Laos. We find that REDD+ social safeguards have been applied by both donors and state actors in ways that facilitate external control. We underscore how authoritarian regime control over civil society and ethnic minority groups thwarts justice. We also highlight how this political culture and lack of inclusiveness are used by donors and project managers to implement their projects with little political debate. Further obstacles to justice relate to limitations inherent in the REDD+ instrument, including tight schedules for dealing with highly sensitive socio-political issues under social safeguards. These findings echo other research but go further in questioning the adequacy of safeguards to promote justice under a nationally driven REDD+. We highlight the importance of recognition and political context, including aspects such as power relations, self-determination and self-governance of traditional or customary structures, in shaping justice outcomes. |
| spellingShingle | Ramcilovic-Suominen, S Carodenuto, S McDermott, C Hiedanpää, J Environmental justice and REDD+ safeguards in Laos: lessons from an authoritarian political regime |
| title | Environmental justice and REDD+ safeguards in Laos: lessons from an authoritarian political regime |
| title_full | Environmental justice and REDD+ safeguards in Laos: lessons from an authoritarian political regime |
| title_fullStr | Environmental justice and REDD+ safeguards in Laos: lessons from an authoritarian political regime |
| title_full_unstemmed | Environmental justice and REDD+ safeguards in Laos: lessons from an authoritarian political regime |
| title_short | Environmental justice and REDD+ safeguards in Laos: lessons from an authoritarian political regime |
| title_sort | environmental justice and redd safeguards in laos lessons from an authoritarian political regime |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ramcilovicsuominens environmentaljusticeandreddsafeguardsinlaoslessonsfromanauthoritarianpoliticalregime AT carodenutos environmentaljusticeandreddsafeguardsinlaoslessonsfromanauthoritarianpoliticalregime AT mcdermottc environmentaljusticeandreddsafeguardsinlaoslessonsfromanauthoritarianpoliticalregime AT hiedanpaaj environmentaljusticeandreddsafeguardsinlaoslessonsfromanauthoritarianpoliticalregime |