Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age
Methods to assess the risk of bias in a way that is reliable, reproducible. and transparent to readers, have evolved over time. Viswanathan et al. recently provided updated recommendations for assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. We comment on their recommendati...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2018
|
| _version_ | 1797075150160527360 |
|---|---|
| author | Page, M Boutron, I Hansen, C Altman, D Hróbjartsson, A |
| author_facet | Page, M Boutron, I Hansen, C Altman, D Hróbjartsson, A |
| author_sort | Page, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Methods to assess the risk of bias in a way that is reliable, reproducible. and transparent to readers, have evolved over time. Viswanathan et al. recently provided updated recommendations for assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. We comment on their recommendations and discuss new tools in development that we, as co-convenors and coordinators of the Cochrane Bias Methods Group, are leading, which complement the methods recommended. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:46:16Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:7100f5d7-90b3-4ced-84dd-e83e47c6175c |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:46:16Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:7100f5d7-90b3-4ced-84dd-e83e47c6175c2022-03-26T19:40:56ZAssessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation ageJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7100f5d7-90b3-4ced-84dd-e83e47c6175cEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2018Page, MBoutron, IHansen, CAltman, DHróbjartsson, AMethods to assess the risk of bias in a way that is reliable, reproducible. and transparent to readers, have evolved over time. Viswanathan et al. recently provided updated recommendations for assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. We comment on their recommendations and discuss new tools in development that we, as co-convenors and coordinators of the Cochrane Bias Methods Group, are leading, which complement the methods recommended. |
| spellingShingle | Page, M Boutron, I Hansen, C Altman, D Hróbjartsson, A Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age |
| title | Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age |
| title_full | Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age |
| title_fullStr | Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age |
| title_short | Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age |
| title_sort | assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions recommendations in the misinformation age |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pagem assessingriskofbiasinstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsrecommendationsinthemisinformationage AT boutroni assessingriskofbiasinstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsrecommendationsinthemisinformationage AT hansenc assessingriskofbiasinstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsrecommendationsinthemisinformationage AT altmand assessingriskofbiasinstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsrecommendationsinthemisinformationage AT hrobjartssona assessingriskofbiasinstudiesthatevaluatehealthcareinterventionsrecommendationsinthemisinformationage |