Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age
Methods to assess the risk of bias in a way that is reliable, reproducible. and transparent to readers, have evolved over time. Viswanathan et al. recently provided updated recommendations for assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. We comment on their recommendati...
Main Authors: | Page, M, Boutron, I, Hansen, C, Altman, D, Hróbjartsson, A |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Similar Items
-
The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.
by: Turner, L, et al.
Published: (2013) -
ASSESSING RISK OF BIAS IN RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS INCLUDED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: THE WHY IS EASY, THE HOW IS A CHALLENGE
by: Hrobjartsson, A, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Depression, reduced education, and bias perceptions as risk factors of beliefs in misinformation
by: Marco Delmastro, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01) -
Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2013) -
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions
by: Sterne, J, et al.
Published: (2016)