Non-contact vital sign monitoring of patients in an intensive care unit: A human factors analysis of staff expectations

<p><strong>Background</strong> Infra-red and thermal imaging enable wireless systems to monitor patients’ vital signs and absence of wires may improve patient experiences. No studies have explored staff perceptions of the concept of this specific type of technology in the adult pop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ede, J, Vollam, S, Darbyshire, J, Gibson, O, Tarrassenko, L, Watkinson, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020
Description
Summary:<p><strong>Background</strong> Infra-red and thermal imaging enable wireless systems to monitor patients’ vital signs and absence of wires may improve patient experiences. No studies have explored staff perceptions of the concept of this specific type of technology in the adult population. Understanding existing working systems before introducing technology could improve adoption.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> We conducted semi-structured interviews with Intensive Care Unit (ICU) staff exploring perceptions of wireless patient monitoring. We used the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to guide thematic analysis.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> We identified usability themes relating to staff perceptions of current patient monitoring experiences, staff perceptions of patient/relative expectations of ICU care, troubleshooting, hierarchy of monitoring, and consensus of trust.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion</strong> The concept of wireless monitoring has perceived benefits for patients and staff. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model guided a systems-based exploratory evaluation. Results highlight the social and environmental factors which may influence usability, adoption, or abandonment of wireless technology in the ICU.</p>