Can homogeneous nucleation resolve the inner core nucleation paradox?

The formation of Earth's solid inner core is thought to mark a profound change in the evolution of the deep Earth and the power that is available to generate the geomagnetic field. Previous studies generally find that the inner core nucleated around 0.5–1 billion years ago, but neglect the fact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wilson, A, Alfe, D, Walker, A, Davies, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023
_version_ 1797110630658867200
author Wilson, A
Alfe, D
Walker, A
Davies, C
author_facet Wilson, A
Alfe, D
Walker, A
Davies, C
author_sort Wilson, A
collection OXFORD
description The formation of Earth's solid inner core is thought to mark a profound change in the evolution of the deep Earth and the power that is available to generate the geomagnetic field. Previous studies generally find that the inner core nucleated around 0.5–1 billion years ago, but neglect the fact that homogeneous liquids must be cooled far below their melting point in order for solids to form spontaneously. The classical theory of nucleation predicts that the core must be undercooled by several hundred K, which is incompatible with estimates of the core's present-day temperature. This “inner core nucleation paradox” therefore asserts that the present inner core should not have formed, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of deep Earth evolution. In this paper we explore the nucleation process in as yet untested iron-rich systems which may comprise the Earth's early core. We find that 1 mol.% Si and S increase the supercooling required to freeze the inner core compared to pure iron by 400 K and 1000 K respectively. 10 mol.% O reduces the required inner core nucleation supercooling to 730 K and 3 mol.% C to only 612 K, which is close to resolving the paradox but still requires that the inner core formed recently.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:57:32Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:720910bd-7cd8-495e-b866-59830c85d038
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:57:32Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:720910bd-7cd8-495e-b866-59830c85d0382023-09-01T13:50:34ZCan homogeneous nucleation resolve the inner core nucleation paradox?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:720910bd-7cd8-495e-b866-59830c85d038EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2023Wilson, AAlfe, DWalker, ADavies, CThe formation of Earth's solid inner core is thought to mark a profound change in the evolution of the deep Earth and the power that is available to generate the geomagnetic field. Previous studies generally find that the inner core nucleated around 0.5–1 billion years ago, but neglect the fact that homogeneous liquids must be cooled far below their melting point in order for solids to form spontaneously. The classical theory of nucleation predicts that the core must be undercooled by several hundred K, which is incompatible with estimates of the core's present-day temperature. This “inner core nucleation paradox” therefore asserts that the present inner core should not have formed, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of deep Earth evolution. In this paper we explore the nucleation process in as yet untested iron-rich systems which may comprise the Earth's early core. We find that 1 mol.% Si and S increase the supercooling required to freeze the inner core compared to pure iron by 400 K and 1000 K respectively. 10 mol.% O reduces the required inner core nucleation supercooling to 730 K and 3 mol.% C to only 612 K, which is close to resolving the paradox but still requires that the inner core formed recently.
spellingShingle Wilson, A
Alfe, D
Walker, A
Davies, C
Can homogeneous nucleation resolve the inner core nucleation paradox?
title Can homogeneous nucleation resolve the inner core nucleation paradox?
title_full Can homogeneous nucleation resolve the inner core nucleation paradox?
title_fullStr Can homogeneous nucleation resolve the inner core nucleation paradox?
title_full_unstemmed Can homogeneous nucleation resolve the inner core nucleation paradox?
title_short Can homogeneous nucleation resolve the inner core nucleation paradox?
title_sort can homogeneous nucleation resolve the inner core nucleation paradox
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsona canhomogeneousnucleationresolvetheinnercorenucleationparadox
AT alfed canhomogeneousnucleationresolvetheinnercorenucleationparadox
AT walkera canhomogeneousnucleationresolvetheinnercorenucleationparadox
AT daviesc canhomogeneousnucleationresolvetheinnercorenucleationparadox