Helicity amplitude analysis of χ cJ → ϕϕ
Using (447.9 ± 2.3) million ψ(3686) events collected with the BESIII detector, the decays of χcJ→ ϕϕ (J = 0, 1, 2) have been studied via the decay ψ(3686) → γχcJ. The branching fractions of the decays χcJ→ ϕϕ (J = 0, 1, 2) are determined to be (8.59 ± 0.27 ± 0.20) × 10−4, (4.26 ± 0.13 ± 0.15) × 10−4...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2023
|
| _version_ | 1824458797677019136 |
|---|---|
| author | Ablikim, M Achasov, MN Adlarson, P Albrecht, M Aliberti, R Amoroso, A An, MR An, Q Bai, XH Bai, Y Bakina, O Baldini Ferroli, R Balossino, I Ban, Y Batozskaya, V Becker, D Begzsuren, K Berger, N Bertani, M Bettoni, D Bianchi, F Bloms, J Bortone, A Boyko, I Fischer, K Gilman, A Malde, S Tat, M Wilkinson, G Zhang, Y |
| author_facet | Ablikim, M Achasov, MN Adlarson, P Albrecht, M Aliberti, R Amoroso, A An, MR An, Q Bai, XH Bai, Y Bakina, O Baldini Ferroli, R Balossino, I Ban, Y Batozskaya, V Becker, D Begzsuren, K Berger, N Bertani, M Bettoni, D Bianchi, F Bloms, J Bortone, A Boyko, I Fischer, K Gilman, A Malde, S Tat, M Wilkinson, G Zhang, Y |
| author_sort | Ablikim, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Using (447.9 ± 2.3) million ψ(3686) events collected with the BESIII detector, the decays of χcJ→ ϕϕ (J = 0, 1, 2) have been studied via the decay ψ(3686) → γχcJ. The branching fractions of the decays χcJ→ ϕϕ (J = 0, 1, 2) are determined to be (8.59 ± 0.27 ± 0.20) × 10−4, (4.26 ± 0.13 ± 0.15) × 10−4, and (12.67 ± 0.28 ± 0.33) × 10−4, respectively, which are the most precise measurements to date. From a helicity amplitude analysis of the process ψ(3686) → γχcJ, χcJ→ ϕϕ, ϕ → K+K−, the polarization parameters of the χcJ→ ϕϕ decays are determined for the first time. |
| first_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:31:36Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:7267fa12-7da0-4d7c-906b-04e5513f565a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:31:36Z |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:7267fa12-7da0-4d7c-906b-04e5513f565a2025-01-07T20:08:59ZHelicity amplitude analysis of χ cJ → ϕϕJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7267fa12-7da0-4d7c-906b-04e5513f565aEnglishJisc Publications RouterSpringer2023Ablikim, MAchasov, MNAdlarson, PAlbrecht, MAliberti, RAmoroso, AAn, MRAn, QBai, XHBai, YBakina, OBaldini Ferroli, RBalossino, IBan, YBatozskaya, VBecker, DBegzsuren, KBerger, NBertani, MBettoni, DBianchi, FBloms, JBortone, ABoyko, IFischer, KGilman, AMalde, STat, MWilkinson, GZhang, YUsing (447.9 ± 2.3) million ψ(3686) events collected with the BESIII detector, the decays of χcJ→ ϕϕ (J = 0, 1, 2) have been studied via the decay ψ(3686) → γχcJ. The branching fractions of the decays χcJ→ ϕϕ (J = 0, 1, 2) are determined to be (8.59 ± 0.27 ± 0.20) × 10−4, (4.26 ± 0.13 ± 0.15) × 10−4, and (12.67 ± 0.28 ± 0.33) × 10−4, respectively, which are the most precise measurements to date. From a helicity amplitude analysis of the process ψ(3686) → γχcJ, χcJ→ ϕϕ, ϕ → K+K−, the polarization parameters of the χcJ→ ϕϕ decays are determined for the first time. |
| spellingShingle | Ablikim, M Achasov, MN Adlarson, P Albrecht, M Aliberti, R Amoroso, A An, MR An, Q Bai, XH Bai, Y Bakina, O Baldini Ferroli, R Balossino, I Ban, Y Batozskaya, V Becker, D Begzsuren, K Berger, N Bertani, M Bettoni, D Bianchi, F Bloms, J Bortone, A Boyko, I Fischer, K Gilman, A Malde, S Tat, M Wilkinson, G Zhang, Y Helicity amplitude analysis of χ cJ → ϕϕ |
| title | Helicity amplitude analysis of χ cJ → ϕϕ |
| title_full | Helicity amplitude analysis of χ cJ → ϕϕ |
| title_fullStr | Helicity amplitude analysis of χ cJ → ϕϕ |
| title_full_unstemmed | Helicity amplitude analysis of χ cJ → ϕϕ |
| title_short | Helicity amplitude analysis of χ cJ → ϕϕ |
| title_sort | helicity amplitude analysis of χ cj ϕϕ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ablikimm helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT achasovmn helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT adlarsonp helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT albrechtm helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT alibertir helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT amorosoa helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT anmr helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT anq helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT baixh helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT baiy helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT bakinao helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT baldiniferrolir helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT balossinoi helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT bany helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT batozskayav helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT beckerd helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT begzsurenk helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT bergern helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT bertanim helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT bettonid helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT bianchif helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT blomsj helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT bortonea helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT boykoi helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT fischerk helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT gilmana helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT maldes helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT tatm helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT wilkinsong helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph AT zhangy helicityamplitudeanalysisofchcjphph |