Ellsberg's 2-color experiment, bid-ask behavior and ambiguity

Results in this note relate the observation of an interval of prices at which a DM strictly prefers to hold a zero position on an asset (termed 'bid-ask behavior') to the DM's perception of the underlying payoff relevant events as ambiguous, as the term is defined in Epstein and Zhang...

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijät: Mukerji, S, Tallon, J
Aineistotyyppi: Working paper
Julkaistu: University of Oxford 2002
_version_ 1826278949834981376
author Mukerji, S
Tallon, J
author_facet Mukerji, S
Tallon, J
author_sort Mukerji, S
collection OXFORD
description Results in this note relate the observation of an interval of prices at which a DM strictly prefers to hold a zero position on an asset (termed 'bid-ask behavior') to the DM's perception of the underlying payoff relevant events as ambiguous, as the term is defined in Epstein and Zhang (2001). The connection between bid-ask behavior and ambiguity is established without invoking a parametric preference form, such as the Choquet expected utility or the max-min multiple priors model. This allows us to draw an observable distinction between bid-ask behavior that may arise purely due to first-order risk aversion type effects, such as those which could arise even if preferences were probabilistically sophisticated, and the bid-ask behavior that involve ambiguity perceptions.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:51:33Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:72c76002-1f0c-441c-8d8f-6da4e61a6cd6
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:51:33Z
publishDate 2002
publisher University of Oxford
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:72c76002-1f0c-441c-8d8f-6da4e61a6cd62022-03-26T19:52:15ZEllsberg's 2-color experiment, bid-ask behavior and ambiguityWorking paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:72c76002-1f0c-441c-8d8f-6da4e61a6cd6Symplectic ElementsBulk import via SwordUniversity of Oxford2002Mukerji, STallon, JResults in this note relate the observation of an interval of prices at which a DM strictly prefers to hold a zero position on an asset (termed 'bid-ask behavior') to the DM's perception of the underlying payoff relevant events as ambiguous, as the term is defined in Epstein and Zhang (2001). The connection between bid-ask behavior and ambiguity is established without invoking a parametric preference form, such as the Choquet expected utility or the max-min multiple priors model. This allows us to draw an observable distinction between bid-ask behavior that may arise purely due to first-order risk aversion type effects, such as those which could arise even if preferences were probabilistically sophisticated, and the bid-ask behavior that involve ambiguity perceptions.
spellingShingle Mukerji, S
Tallon, J
Ellsberg's 2-color experiment, bid-ask behavior and ambiguity
title Ellsberg's 2-color experiment, bid-ask behavior and ambiguity
title_full Ellsberg's 2-color experiment, bid-ask behavior and ambiguity
title_fullStr Ellsberg's 2-color experiment, bid-ask behavior and ambiguity
title_full_unstemmed Ellsberg's 2-color experiment, bid-ask behavior and ambiguity
title_short Ellsberg's 2-color experiment, bid-ask behavior and ambiguity
title_sort ellsberg s 2 color experiment bid ask behavior and ambiguity
work_keys_str_mv AT mukerjis ellsbergs2colorexperimentbidaskbehaviorandambiguity
AT tallonj ellsbergs2colorexperimentbidaskbehaviorandambiguity