Global aid allocation: Are Nordic donors different?

The Nordic development assistance programs have earned a reputation for commitment to human rights and democracy. Is the reputation deserved? We address this question by comparing how much aid donors give and to which recipient countries. Using a global panel data set, spanning the period 1980-99 an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gates, S, Hoeffler, A
Format: Working paper
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
_version_ 1826279066647396352
author Gates, S
Hoeffler, A
author_facet Gates, S
Hoeffler, A
author_sort Gates, S
collection OXFORD
description The Nordic development assistance programs have earned a reputation for commitment to human rights and democracy. Is the reputation deserved? We address this question by comparing how much aid donors give and to which recipient countries. Using a global panel data set, spanning the period 1980-99 and 91 recipient countries, we find that individual bilateral donors vary considerably from one another. Nordic aid distribution differs significantly from other bilateral aid donor patterns: Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland provide more aid to democracies but do not penalise poor trade policies. Unlike other bilateral donors the four Nordics do not provide more aid to political allies. We also find some evidence that recipients with a good human rights record receive more aid from Nordic donors.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T23:53:17Z
format Working paper
id oxford-uuid:7359bec6-16a2-4f25-94fb-bc5bb074feae
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T23:53:17Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7359bec6-16a2-4f25-94fb-bc5bb074feae2022-03-26T19:55:51ZGlobal aid allocation: Are Nordic donors different?Working paperhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042uuid:7359bec6-16a2-4f25-94fb-bc5bb074feaeEconomicsDevelopment economicsEnglishOxford University Research Archive - Valet2004Gates, SHoeffler, AThe Nordic development assistance programs have earned a reputation for commitment to human rights and democracy. Is the reputation deserved? We address this question by comparing how much aid donors give and to which recipient countries. Using a global panel data set, spanning the period 1980-99 and 91 recipient countries, we find that individual bilateral donors vary considerably from one another. Nordic aid distribution differs significantly from other bilateral aid donor patterns: Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland provide more aid to democracies but do not penalise poor trade policies. Unlike other bilateral donors the four Nordics do not provide more aid to political allies. We also find some evidence that recipients with a good human rights record receive more aid from Nordic donors.
spellingShingle Economics
Development economics
Gates, S
Hoeffler, A
Global aid allocation: Are Nordic donors different?
title Global aid allocation: Are Nordic donors different?
title_full Global aid allocation: Are Nordic donors different?
title_fullStr Global aid allocation: Are Nordic donors different?
title_full_unstemmed Global aid allocation: Are Nordic donors different?
title_short Global aid allocation: Are Nordic donors different?
title_sort global aid allocation are nordic donors different
topic Economics
Development economics
work_keys_str_mv AT gatess globalaidallocationarenordicdonorsdifferent
AT hoefflera globalaidallocationarenordicdonorsdifferent