Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the CONSORT for Abstracts guidelines, and different editorial policies used by five leading general medical journals to implement the guidelines, on the reporting quality of abstracts of randomised trials. DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SAMPLE: We r...
| Главные авторы: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Journal article |
| Язык: | English |
| Опубликовано: |
2012
|
| _version_ | 1826279302273957888 |
|---|---|
| author | Hopewell, S Ravaud, P Baron, G Boutron, I |
| author_facet | Hopewell, S Ravaud, P Baron, G Boutron, I |
| author_sort | Hopewell, S |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the CONSORT for Abstracts guidelines, and different editorial policies used by five leading general medical journals to implement the guidelines, on the reporting quality of abstracts of randomised trials. DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SAMPLE: We randomly selected up to 60 primary reports of randomised trials per journal per year from five high impact, general medical journals in 2006-09, if indexed in PubMed with an electronic abstract. We excluded reports that did not include an electronic abstract, and any secondary trial publications or economic analyses. We classified journals in three categories: those not mentioning the guidelines in their instructions to authors (JAMA and New England Journal of Medicine), those referring to the guidelines in their instructions to authors but with no specific policy to implement them (BMJ), and those referring to the guidelines in their instructions to authors with an active policy to implement them (Annals of Internal Medicine and Lancet). Two authors extracted data independently using the CONSORT for Abstracts checklist. MAIN OUTCOME: Mean number of CONSORT items reported in selected abstracts, among nine items reported in fewer than 50% of the abstracts published across the five journals in 2006. RESULTS: We assessed 955 reports of abstracts of randomised trials. Journals with an active policy to enforce the guidelines showed an immediate increase in the level of mean number of items reported (increase of 1.50 items; P=0.0037). At 23 months after publication of the guidelines, the mean number of items reported per abstract for the primary outcome was 5.41 of nine items, a 53% increase compared with the expected level estimated on the basis of pre-intervention trends. The change in level or trend did not increase in journals with no policy to enforce the guidelines (BMJ, JAMA, and New England Journal of Medicine). CONCLUSION: Active implementation of the CONSORT for Abstracts guidelines by journals can lead to improvements in the reporting of abstracts of randomised trials. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:56:41Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:74741c6f-0ea4-4a9c-a0ea-7a96fd9d86e4 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T23:56:41Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:74741c6f-0ea4-4a9c-a0ea-7a96fd9d86e42022-03-26T20:02:59ZEffect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:74741c6f-0ea4-4a9c-a0ea-7a96fd9d86e4EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Hopewell, SRavaud, PBaron, GBoutron, IOBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the CONSORT for Abstracts guidelines, and different editorial policies used by five leading general medical journals to implement the guidelines, on the reporting quality of abstracts of randomised trials. DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SAMPLE: We randomly selected up to 60 primary reports of randomised trials per journal per year from five high impact, general medical journals in 2006-09, if indexed in PubMed with an electronic abstract. We excluded reports that did not include an electronic abstract, and any secondary trial publications or economic analyses. We classified journals in three categories: those not mentioning the guidelines in their instructions to authors (JAMA and New England Journal of Medicine), those referring to the guidelines in their instructions to authors but with no specific policy to implement them (BMJ), and those referring to the guidelines in their instructions to authors with an active policy to implement them (Annals of Internal Medicine and Lancet). Two authors extracted data independently using the CONSORT for Abstracts checklist. MAIN OUTCOME: Mean number of CONSORT items reported in selected abstracts, among nine items reported in fewer than 50% of the abstracts published across the five journals in 2006. RESULTS: We assessed 955 reports of abstracts of randomised trials. Journals with an active policy to enforce the guidelines showed an immediate increase in the level of mean number of items reported (increase of 1.50 items; P=0.0037). At 23 months after publication of the guidelines, the mean number of items reported per abstract for the primary outcome was 5.41 of nine items, a 53% increase compared with the expected level estimated on the basis of pre-intervention trends. The change in level or trend did not increase in journals with no policy to enforce the guidelines (BMJ, JAMA, and New England Journal of Medicine). CONCLUSION: Active implementation of the CONSORT for Abstracts guidelines by journals can lead to improvements in the reporting of abstracts of randomised trials. |
| spellingShingle | Hopewell, S Ravaud, P Baron, G Boutron, I Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. |
| title | Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. |
| title_full | Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. |
| title_fullStr | Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. |
| title_short | Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. |
| title_sort | effect of editors implementation of consort guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals interrupted time series analysis |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hopewells effectofeditorsimplementationofconsortguidelinesonthereportingofabstractsinhighimpactmedicaljournalsinterruptedtimeseriesanalysis AT ravaudp effectofeditorsimplementationofconsortguidelinesonthereportingofabstractsinhighimpactmedicaljournalsinterruptedtimeseriesanalysis AT barong effectofeditorsimplementationofconsortguidelinesonthereportingofabstractsinhighimpactmedicaljournalsinterruptedtimeseriesanalysis AT boutroni effectofeditorsimplementationofconsortguidelinesonthereportingofabstractsinhighimpactmedicaljournalsinterruptedtimeseriesanalysis |