The ways that parted in the library: the Gospels according to Matthew and according to the Hebrews in Late Ancient Heresiology

This article traces how early Christian thinkers (including Irenaeus, Eusebius, Epiphanius, and Jerome) conceptualised ‘Jewishness’ in bibliographic terms. The material that early Christian sources associate with the Gospel according to the Hebrews exhibits a substantial textual relationship to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coogan, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022
_version_ 1797111927883694080
author Coogan, J
author_facet Coogan, J
author_sort Coogan, J
collection OXFORD
description This article traces how early Christian thinkers (including Irenaeus, Eusebius, Epiphanius, and Jerome) conceptualised ‘Jewishness’ in bibliographic terms. The material that early Christian sources associate with the Gospel according to the Hebrews exhibits a substantial textual relationship to the Gospel according to Matthew. The distinction emerges within a fourth- and fifth-century CE heresiological project of bibliographic categorisation that seeks to differentiate Jewish and Christian books and readers. Bibliography is a way of distinguishing reading communities and thereby advances the late ancient rhetorical project known as the parting of the ways between Judaism and Christianity.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:15:41Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:7492121b-64b4-4837-9594-906ad8fdf0a1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:15:41Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7492121b-64b4-4837-9594-906ad8fdf0a12024-01-05T07:46:13ZThe ways that parted in the library: the Gospels according to Matthew and according to the Hebrews in Late Ancient HeresiologyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7492121b-64b4-4837-9594-906ad8fdf0a1EnglishSymplectic ElementsCambridge University Press2022Coogan, JThis article traces how early Christian thinkers (including Irenaeus, Eusebius, Epiphanius, and Jerome) conceptualised ‘Jewishness’ in bibliographic terms. The material that early Christian sources associate with the Gospel according to the Hebrews exhibits a substantial textual relationship to the Gospel according to Matthew. The distinction emerges within a fourth- and fifth-century CE heresiological project of bibliographic categorisation that seeks to differentiate Jewish and Christian books and readers. Bibliography is a way of distinguishing reading communities and thereby advances the late ancient rhetorical project known as the parting of the ways between Judaism and Christianity.
spellingShingle Coogan, J
The ways that parted in the library: the Gospels according to Matthew and according to the Hebrews in Late Ancient Heresiology
title The ways that parted in the library: the Gospels according to Matthew and according to the Hebrews in Late Ancient Heresiology
title_full The ways that parted in the library: the Gospels according to Matthew and according to the Hebrews in Late Ancient Heresiology
title_fullStr The ways that parted in the library: the Gospels according to Matthew and according to the Hebrews in Late Ancient Heresiology
title_full_unstemmed The ways that parted in the library: the Gospels according to Matthew and according to the Hebrews in Late Ancient Heresiology
title_short The ways that parted in the library: the Gospels according to Matthew and according to the Hebrews in Late Ancient Heresiology
title_sort ways that parted in the library the gospels according to matthew and according to the hebrews in late ancient heresiology
work_keys_str_mv AT cooganj thewaysthatpartedinthelibrarythegospelsaccordingtomatthewandaccordingtothehebrewsinlateancientheresiology
AT cooganj waysthatpartedinthelibrarythegospelsaccordingtomatthewandaccordingtothehebrewsinlateancientheresiology