Arguing about moral causation
Here is an influential argument for naturalism: moral properties play causal roles in the natural world, and only naturalism can explain this phenomenon of “moral causation”. Here, I show that this argument from moral causation cannot be maintained. More specifically, the argument relies on the prem...
Main Author: | Baysan, E |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer
2024
|
Similar Items
-
Arguing about law : arguing about philosophy /
by: Kavanagh, Aileen, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Arguing about religion /
by: Timpe, Kevin
Published: (2009) -
Arguing about the mind /
by: Gertler, Brie, et al.
Published: (2007) -
How not to argue about immigration
by: Corlett Angelo J., et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Why incompatibilism about mental causation is incompatible with non-reductive physicalism
by: Christensen, J, et al.
Published: (2018)