Spatial conservation planning with ecological and economic feedback effects

Spatial conservation planning with ecological and economic feedback effects

Show other versions (1)

Most spatial conservation prioritisations being implemented across the globe are based on static approaches to conservation planning. These use snapshots of systems to support decision-making. However, ignoring the dynamic nature of systems can result in misleading spatial prioritisations and missed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Larrosa, C, Carrasco, LR, Tambosi, LR, Banks-Leite, C, Milner-Gulland, EJ
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	Elsevier 2019

Similar Items

Spatial conservation planning with ecological and economic feedback effects
by: Larrosa, C, et al.
Published: (2019)

Unintended feedbacks: challenges and opportunities for improving conservation effectiveness
by: Larrosa, C, et al.
Published: (2016)

The suggestion that landscapes should contain 40% of forest cover lacks evidence and is problematic
by: Banks-Leite, C, et al.
Published: (2021)

The use, and usefulness, of spatial conservation prioritizations
by: Sinclair, SP, et al.
Published: (2018)

Effects of social networks on interventions to change conservation behavior
by: Lange, E, et al.
Published: (2021)

Evaluating a large-scale online behaviour change intervention aimed at wildlife product consumers in Singapore
by: Doughty, H, et al.
Published: (2021)

Remembering Dr. Ben Collen, an exemplary conservation biologist
by: Mace, GM, et al.
Published: (2018)

Conservation cost‐effectiveness: a review of the evidence base
by: Pienkowski, T, et al.
Published: (2021)

Investigating acceptance of marine tourism levies, to cover the opportunity costs of conservation for coastal communities
by: Booth, H, et al.
Published: (2022)

Use of evidence for decision-making by conservation practitioners in the illegal wildlife trade
by: Arias, M, et al.
Published: (2021)

Managing social-ecological systems under uncertainty: implementation in the real world
by: Ana Nuno, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01)

Shark and ray research in India has low relevance to their conservation
by: Gupta, T, et al.
Published: (2021)

Conservation and the rights of Indigenous peoples and local communities: looking forwards
by: Brittain, S, et al.
Published: (2021)

The potential of historical spy-satellite imagery to support research in ecology and conservation
by: Munteanu, C, et al.
Published: (2024)

Motivations for (non‐)compliance with conservation rules by small‐scale resource users
by: Rodrigo Oyanedel, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Drawing on local knowledge and attitudes for the conservation of critically endangered rhino rays in Goa, India
by: Gupta, T, et al.
Published: (2023)

Economic and Ecological Externalities in Spatial Planning
by: Artur Hołuj
Published: (2018-09-01)

A theory of change to improve conservation outcomes through CITES
by: Challender, DWS, et al.
Published: (2025)

Twenty priorities for future social-ecological research on climate resilience
by: Beauchamp, E, et al.
Published: (2020)

Twenty priorities for future social-ecological research on climate resilience
by: Emilie Beauchamp, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

China makes developers pay compensation for their ecological impacts – here’s how this unique scheme works
by: Gao, S, et al.
Published: (2023)

Drawing on local knowledge and attitudes for the conservation of critically endangered rhino rays in Goa, India
by: Trisha Gupta, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

Combining simulation and empirical data to explore the scope for social network interventions in conservation
by: de Lange, E, et al.
Published: (2021)

How can we advance equitable, rights-based conservation?
by: Newing, H, et al.
Published: (2023)

Embracing uncertainty in applied ecology
by: Milner-Gulland, E, et al.
Published: (2017)

The bushmeat trade in northern Ghana: market dynamics, drivers of trade and implications for conservation
by: Sackey, H, et al.
Published: (2022)

Designing celebrity-endorsed behavioral interventions in conservation
by: Olmedo, A, et al.
Published: (2024)

Designing celebrity‐endorsed behavioral interventions in conservation
by: Olmedo, A, et al.
Published: (2024)

How can we advance equitable, rights-based conservation?
by: Helen Newing, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Analyzing the outcomes of China's ecological compensation scheme for development-related biodiversity loss
by: Gao, S, et al.
Published: (2023)

No consistent relationship found between biodiversity metric habitat scores and the presence of species of conservation priority
by: Hawkins, I, et al.
Published: (2022)

Testing a global standard for quantifying species recovery and assessing conservation impact
by: Grace, MK, et al.
Published: (2021)

Exploring the human-nature nexus towards effective nature-based solutions: the Aral Sea case
by: Alikhanova, S, et al.
Published: (2024)

Landscape design: Integrating ecological, social, and economic considerations into conservation planning
by: Anne M. Bartuszevige, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01)

Rangers and modellers collaborate to build and evaluate spatial models of African elephant poaching
by: Kuiper, T, et al.
Published: (2020)

Beyond banning wildlife trade: COVID-19, conservation and development
by: Roe, D, et al.
Published: (2020)

Attitudes to illegal behaviours and conservation in western Tanzania
by: Wilfred, P, et al.
Published: (2017)

Motivations for (non-) compliance with conservation rules by small-scale resource users
by: Oyanedel, R, et al.
Published: (2020)

Exploring trade-offs between development and conservation outcomes in Northern Cambodia
by: Beauchamp, E, et al.
Published: (2017)

The bushmeat trade in northern Ghana: market dynamics, drivers of trade and implications for conservation
by: Hannah N.K. Sackey, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)