The integrated engineering design concept of the upper limiter within the EU-DEMO LIMITER system
The EU-DEMO first wall protection relies on a system of limiters. Although they are primarily designed for facing the energy released by a limited plasma during transients, their design should safely withstand a combination of loads relevant for in-vessel components (IVCs) during steady-state operat...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024
|
| _version_ | 1811139500529680384 |
|---|---|
| author | Richiusa, ML Cardella, A Čufar, A Froio, A Haghdoust, P Ireland, P Maione, I Pagani, I Pautasso, G Ramos, AM Spagnuolo, GA Vigano, F Vizvary, Z |
| author_facet | Richiusa, ML Cardella, A Čufar, A Froio, A Haghdoust, P Ireland, P Maione, I Pagani, I Pautasso, G Ramos, AM Spagnuolo, GA Vigano, F Vizvary, Z |
| author_sort | Richiusa, ML |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The EU-DEMO first wall protection relies on a system of limiters. Although they are primarily designed for facing the energy released by a limited plasma during transients, their design should safely withstand a combination of loads relevant for in-vessel components (IVCs) during steady-state operation. They are not meant to breed tritium, nor to provide plasma stability. However, sitting in place of blanket portions, they should ensure an adequate shielding function to vacuum vessel and magnets while withstanding both their dead weight and the electro-mechanical loads arising from the interaction between current induced in the conductive structure and magnetic field. During plasma disruptions they will be subjected to halo currents flowing from/to the plasma and the grounded structures, whose effects must be added to the eddy current ones. Disruption-induced electro-mechanical loads are hence IVC design-driving, despite the uncertainties in both eddy and halo currents’ magnitude and distribution, which depend on IVC design, electrical connectivity, plasma temperature and halo width. The integrated design of the limiter is made of two actively water-cooled sub-components: the Plasma-Facing Wall (PFW) directly exposed to the plasma, and the Shielding Block (SB) devoted to hold the PFW while providing neutronic shielding. The PFW design is driven by disruptive heat loads. Disruption-induced electro-magnetic loads are instead SB design drivers, meaning that the design details (i.e. geometry, electrical connections, attachments) affect the loads acting on it, which, in turn, are affected by the mechanical response of the structure. The present paper describes the design workflow and assessment of the Upper Limiter (UL), resulting from a close and iterative synergy among different fields. Built on static-structural and energy balance hand calculations based on, respectively, preliminary electro-magnetic and neutronic loads, the UL integrated design performance has then been verified against electro-magnetic, neutronic, thermal-hydraulic and structural assessment under the above-mentioned load combination. The outcome will be taken as reference for future limiter engineering designs. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:07:05Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:75450074-9c76-4478-86e3-85d567443640 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:07:05Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:75450074-9c76-4478-86e3-85d5674436402024-05-31T16:35:36ZThe integrated engineering design concept of the upper limiter within the EU-DEMO LIMITER systemJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:75450074-9c76-4478-86e3-85d567443640EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2024Richiusa, MLCardella, AČufar, AFroio, AHaghdoust, PIreland, PMaione, IPagani, IPautasso, GRamos, AMSpagnuolo, GAVigano, FVizvary, ZThe EU-DEMO first wall protection relies on a system of limiters. Although they are primarily designed for facing the energy released by a limited plasma during transients, their design should safely withstand a combination of loads relevant for in-vessel components (IVCs) during steady-state operation. They are not meant to breed tritium, nor to provide plasma stability. However, sitting in place of blanket portions, they should ensure an adequate shielding function to vacuum vessel and magnets while withstanding both their dead weight and the electro-mechanical loads arising from the interaction between current induced in the conductive structure and magnetic field. During plasma disruptions they will be subjected to halo currents flowing from/to the plasma and the grounded structures, whose effects must be added to the eddy current ones. Disruption-induced electro-mechanical loads are hence IVC design-driving, despite the uncertainties in both eddy and halo currents’ magnitude and distribution, which depend on IVC design, electrical connectivity, plasma temperature and halo width. The integrated design of the limiter is made of two actively water-cooled sub-components: the Plasma-Facing Wall (PFW) directly exposed to the plasma, and the Shielding Block (SB) devoted to hold the PFW while providing neutronic shielding. The PFW design is driven by disruptive heat loads. Disruption-induced electro-magnetic loads are instead SB design drivers, meaning that the design details (i.e. geometry, electrical connections, attachments) affect the loads acting on it, which, in turn, are affected by the mechanical response of the structure. The present paper describes the design workflow and assessment of the Upper Limiter (UL), resulting from a close and iterative synergy among different fields. Built on static-structural and energy balance hand calculations based on, respectively, preliminary electro-magnetic and neutronic loads, the UL integrated design performance has then been verified against electro-magnetic, neutronic, thermal-hydraulic and structural assessment under the above-mentioned load combination. The outcome will be taken as reference for future limiter engineering designs. |
| spellingShingle | Richiusa, ML Cardella, A Čufar, A Froio, A Haghdoust, P Ireland, P Maione, I Pagani, I Pautasso, G Ramos, AM Spagnuolo, GA Vigano, F Vizvary, Z The integrated engineering design concept of the upper limiter within the EU-DEMO LIMITER system |
| title | The integrated engineering design concept of the upper limiter within the EU-DEMO LIMITER system |
| title_full | The integrated engineering design concept of the upper limiter within the EU-DEMO LIMITER system |
| title_fullStr | The integrated engineering design concept of the upper limiter within the EU-DEMO LIMITER system |
| title_full_unstemmed | The integrated engineering design concept of the upper limiter within the EU-DEMO LIMITER system |
| title_short | The integrated engineering design concept of the upper limiter within the EU-DEMO LIMITER system |
| title_sort | integrated engineering design concept of the upper limiter within the eu demo limiter system |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT richiusaml theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT cardellaa theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT cufara theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT froioa theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT haghdoustp theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT irelandp theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT maionei theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT paganii theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT pautassog theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT ramosam theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT spagnuologa theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT viganof theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT vizvaryz theintegratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT richiusaml integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT cardellaa integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT cufara integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT froioa integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT haghdoustp integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT irelandp integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT maionei integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT paganii integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT pautassog integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT ramosam integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT spagnuologa integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT viganof integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem AT vizvaryz integratedengineeringdesignconceptoftheupperlimiterwithintheeudemolimitersystem |