Forceful Federalism against American Racial Inequality

Why, many Americans rightly ask, can material racial inequality and widespread segregation still persist fifty years after the enactment of key civil rights legislation and eight years after the election of an African American to the nation’s highest office? Many from outside the United States pose...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: King, D
Format: Journal article
Published: Cambridge University Press 2017
_version_ 1797076201629548544
author King, D
author_facet King, D
author_sort King, D
collection OXFORD
description Why, many Americans rightly ask, can material racial inequality and widespread segregation still persist fifty years after the enactment of key civil rights legislation and eight years after the election of an African American to the nation’s highest office? Many from outside the United States pose similar questions about modern America. The explanation, I argue lies with inconsistent and fluctuating levels of federal engagement to building material racial equality. National engagement fluctuates because it is energetically resisted and challenged, by opponents of racial progress. This vulnerability to disruption is exposed by varying strategies of resistance, some fiscal, some violent, some judicial, some desultory and some combining violent protest against change with local electoral triumphs for anti-reformers. Public resistance to employing national resources to reduce inequality encouraged a de-racialization strategy amongst many African American candidates for elected office who opt to de-emphasise issues of racial inequality in campaigns and in office. Whatever the means, the effect is uniform: the slowing down or outright death of federal civil rights activism.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:00:46Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:75dc99ff-154f-4718-9b47-f9df089352a5
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:00:46Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:75dc99ff-154f-4718-9b47-f9df089352a52022-03-26T20:12:03ZForceful Federalism against American Racial InequalityJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:75dc99ff-154f-4718-9b47-f9df089352a5Symplectic Elements at OxfordCambridge University Press2017King, DWhy, many Americans rightly ask, can material racial inequality and widespread segregation still persist fifty years after the enactment of key civil rights legislation and eight years after the election of an African American to the nation’s highest office? Many from outside the United States pose similar questions about modern America. The explanation, I argue lies with inconsistent and fluctuating levels of federal engagement to building material racial equality. National engagement fluctuates because it is energetically resisted and challenged, by opponents of racial progress. This vulnerability to disruption is exposed by varying strategies of resistance, some fiscal, some violent, some judicial, some desultory and some combining violent protest against change with local electoral triumphs for anti-reformers. Public resistance to employing national resources to reduce inequality encouraged a de-racialization strategy amongst many African American candidates for elected office who opt to de-emphasise issues of racial inequality in campaigns and in office. Whatever the means, the effect is uniform: the slowing down or outright death of federal civil rights activism.
spellingShingle King, D
Forceful Federalism against American Racial Inequality
title Forceful Federalism against American Racial Inequality
title_full Forceful Federalism against American Racial Inequality
title_fullStr Forceful Federalism against American Racial Inequality
title_full_unstemmed Forceful Federalism against American Racial Inequality
title_short Forceful Federalism against American Racial Inequality
title_sort forceful federalism against american racial inequality
work_keys_str_mv AT kingd forcefulfederalismagainstamericanracialinequality