Image scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave doppler ultrasound measurement
<strong>Objective</strong> To develop an objective, image scoring system for pulsed wave Doppler measurement of maternal uterine and fetal umbilical arteries, and evaluate how the system compares with subjective assessment of the images. <strong>Methods</strong> As part of t...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
2018
|
| _version_ | 1797076239789326336 |
|---|---|
| author | Molloholli, M Napolitano, R Ohuma, E Ash, S Wanyonyi, S Cavallaro, A Giudicepietro, A Barros, F Carvalho, M Norris, S Min, M Zainab, G Papageorghiou, A |
| author_facet | Molloholli, M Napolitano, R Ohuma, E Ash, S Wanyonyi, S Cavallaro, A Giudicepietro, A Barros, F Carvalho, M Norris, S Min, M Zainab, G Papageorghiou, A |
| author_sort | Molloholli, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <strong>Objective</strong> To develop an objective, image scoring system for pulsed wave Doppler measurement of maternal uterine and fetal umbilical arteries, and evaluate how the system compares with subjective assessment of the images. <strong>Methods</strong> As part of the quality control strategy for the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project, we developed a scoring system based on six predefined criteria for uterine and umbilical artery pulsed wave Doppler measurement. The scoring system was compared to subjective assessment, which consisted simply of classifying an image as acceptable or unacceptable. Based on a sample size estimate, a total of 120 ultrasound images of umbilical and uterine artery Doppler were randomly selected from the INTERGROWTH‐21st database. Two independent reviewers evaluated these images in a blinded fashion both subjectively and using the six‐point scoring system. The percentage agreement and kappa statistic between the two methods were compared. <strong>Results</strong> The overall agreement between reviewers was higher for objective assessment using the scoring system (agreement: 85%, adjusted kappa: 0.70), than for subjective assessment (agreement: 70%, adjusted kappa: 0.47). The levels of agreement for the six components of the scoring system were: anatomical site (adjusted kappa: 0.97), sweep speed (0.88), magnification (0.77), velocity scale (0.68), image clarity (0.68), and angle of insonation (0.65). <strong>Conclusion</strong> In quality assessment of umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave Doppler measurements, an objective six‐point image scoring system is associated with greater reproducibility than subjective assessment. We recommend this as the preferred method for quality control, audit and teaching. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:01:17Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:760b5128-c785-4737-a5b6-032092e13e4a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:01:17Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | John Wiley and Sons, Inc. |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:760b5128-c785-4737-a5b6-032092e13e4a2022-03-26T20:13:09ZImage scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave doppler ultrasound measurementJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:760b5128-c785-4737-a5b6-032092e13e4aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordJohn Wiley and Sons, Inc.2018Molloholli, MNapolitano, ROhuma, EAsh, SWanyonyi, SCavallaro, AGiudicepietro, ABarros, FCarvalho, MNorris, SMin, MZainab, GPapageorghiou, A<strong>Objective</strong> To develop an objective, image scoring system for pulsed wave Doppler measurement of maternal uterine and fetal umbilical arteries, and evaluate how the system compares with subjective assessment of the images. <strong>Methods</strong> As part of the quality control strategy for the INTERGROWTH‐21st Project, we developed a scoring system based on six predefined criteria for uterine and umbilical artery pulsed wave Doppler measurement. The scoring system was compared to subjective assessment, which consisted simply of classifying an image as acceptable or unacceptable. Based on a sample size estimate, a total of 120 ultrasound images of umbilical and uterine artery Doppler were randomly selected from the INTERGROWTH‐21st database. Two independent reviewers evaluated these images in a blinded fashion both subjectively and using the six‐point scoring system. The percentage agreement and kappa statistic between the two methods were compared. <strong>Results</strong> The overall agreement between reviewers was higher for objective assessment using the scoring system (agreement: 85%, adjusted kappa: 0.70), than for subjective assessment (agreement: 70%, adjusted kappa: 0.47). The levels of agreement for the six components of the scoring system were: anatomical site (adjusted kappa: 0.97), sweep speed (0.88), magnification (0.77), velocity scale (0.68), image clarity (0.68), and angle of insonation (0.65). <strong>Conclusion</strong> In quality assessment of umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave Doppler measurements, an objective six‐point image scoring system is associated with greater reproducibility than subjective assessment. We recommend this as the preferred method for quality control, audit and teaching. |
| spellingShingle | Molloholli, M Napolitano, R Ohuma, E Ash, S Wanyonyi, S Cavallaro, A Giudicepietro, A Barros, F Carvalho, M Norris, S Min, M Zainab, G Papageorghiou, A Image scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave doppler ultrasound measurement |
| title | Image scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave doppler ultrasound measurement |
| title_full | Image scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave doppler ultrasound measurement |
| title_fullStr | Image scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave doppler ultrasound measurement |
| title_full_unstemmed | Image scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave doppler ultrasound measurement |
| title_short | Image scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave doppler ultrasound measurement |
| title_sort | image scoring system for umbilical and uterine artery pulsed wave doppler ultrasound measurement |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mollohollim imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT napolitanor imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT ohumae imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT ashs imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT wanyonyis imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT cavallaroa imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT giudicepietroa imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT barrosf imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT carvalhom imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT norriss imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT minm imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT zainabg imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement AT papageorghioua imagescoringsystemforumbilicalanduterinearterypulsedwavedopplerultrasoundmeasurement |