The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of positive surgical margin (PSM) size/focality and location in relation to risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological data were collected from 904 patients who underwent RARP at a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sooriakumaran, P, Ploumidis, A, Nyberg, T, Olsson, M, Akre, O, Haendler, L, Egevad, L, Nilsson, A, Carlsson, S, Jonsson, M, Adding, C, Hosseini, A, Steineck, G, Wiklund, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2015
_version_ 1797076427770691584
author Sooriakumaran, P
Ploumidis, A
Nyberg, T
Olsson, M
Akre, O
Haendler, L
Egevad, L
Nilsson, A
Carlsson, S
Jonsson, M
Adding, C
Hosseini, A
Steineck, G
Wiklund, P
author_facet Sooriakumaran, P
Ploumidis, A
Nyberg, T
Olsson, M
Akre, O
Haendler, L
Egevad, L
Nilsson, A
Carlsson, S
Jonsson, M
Adding, C
Hosseini, A
Steineck, G
Wiklund, P
author_sort Sooriakumaran, P
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of positive surgical margin (PSM) size/focality and location in relation to risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological data were collected from 904 patients who underwent RARP at a single European institution from 2002 to 2006. PSM status after RARP was defined as cancer cells at the inked margin, and was stratified by size/focality and location. The outcome variable was BCR, defined as a postoperative PSA level of ≥0.2 ng/mL. We modelled clinicopathological covariates including PSM size/focality and location using Cox proportional hazards regression. In subgroup analyses, we assessed the effect of PSM size and location at different pathological stages and grades of disease. RESULTS: Compared with negative SM, a PSM of >3 mm/multifocal was associated with an increased risk of BCR in the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 2.84, 95% confidence interval 1.76-4.59), while unifocal PSMs of ≤3 mm were not significantly associated with BCR. In subgroup analyses, the negative impact of >3 mm/multifocal PSM appeared greatest in those with lower postoperative stage and grade of disease. The prognostic role of PSM location was unconfirmed, although data indicated that posterolateral PSMs may be of lower significance in RARP patients. The study is limited by lack of central pathology review, and lack of statistical adjustment for tumour volume, lymph node status, and surgeon volume. CONCLUSION: We found that men with >3 mm/multifocal PSMs have a higher risk of BCR than those with unifocal PSMs of ≤3 mm or negative SMs, especially if they have lower risk disease. Posterolateral margins may be of little significance in a RARP population.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:03:37Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:76cfa837-91b8-491f-8d16-8ec5ed556d3b
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:03:37Z
publishDate 2015
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:76cfa837-91b8-491f-8d16-8ec5ed556d3b2022-03-26T20:18:48ZThe impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:76cfa837-91b8-491f-8d16-8ec5ed556d3bEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2015Sooriakumaran, PPloumidis, ANyberg, TOlsson, MAkre, OHaendler, LEgevad, LNilsson, ACarlsson, SJonsson, MAdding, CHosseini, ASteineck, GWiklund, POBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of positive surgical margin (PSM) size/focality and location in relation to risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinicopathological data were collected from 904 patients who underwent RARP at a single European institution from 2002 to 2006. PSM status after RARP was defined as cancer cells at the inked margin, and was stratified by size/focality and location. The outcome variable was BCR, defined as a postoperative PSA level of ≥0.2 ng/mL. We modelled clinicopathological covariates including PSM size/focality and location using Cox proportional hazards regression. In subgroup analyses, we assessed the effect of PSM size and location at different pathological stages and grades of disease. RESULTS: Compared with negative SM, a PSM of >3 mm/multifocal was associated with an increased risk of BCR in the entire cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 2.84, 95% confidence interval 1.76-4.59), while unifocal PSMs of ≤3 mm were not significantly associated with BCR. In subgroup analyses, the negative impact of >3 mm/multifocal PSM appeared greatest in those with lower postoperative stage and grade of disease. The prognostic role of PSM location was unconfirmed, although data indicated that posterolateral PSMs may be of lower significance in RARP patients. The study is limited by lack of central pathology review, and lack of statistical adjustment for tumour volume, lymph node status, and surgeon volume. CONCLUSION: We found that men with >3 mm/multifocal PSMs have a higher risk of BCR than those with unifocal PSMs of ≤3 mm or negative SMs, especially if they have lower risk disease. Posterolateral margins may be of little significance in a RARP population.
spellingShingle Sooriakumaran, P
Ploumidis, A
Nyberg, T
Olsson, M
Akre, O
Haendler, L
Egevad, L
Nilsson, A
Carlsson, S
Jonsson, M
Adding, C
Hosseini, A
Steineck, G
Wiklund, P
The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
title The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
title_full The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
title_fullStr The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
title_full_unstemmed The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
title_short The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
title_sort impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow up of 5 years
work_keys_str_mv AT sooriakumaranp theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT ploumidisa theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT nybergt theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT olssonm theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT akreo theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT haendlerl theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT egevadl theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT nilssona theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT carlssons theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT jonssonm theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT addingc theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT hosseinia theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT steineckg theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT wiklundp theimpactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT sooriakumaranp impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT ploumidisa impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT nybergt impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT olssonm impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT akreo impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT haendlerl impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT egevadl impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT nilssona impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT carlssons impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT jonssonm impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT addingc impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT hosseinia impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT steineckg impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years
AT wiklundp impactoflengthandlocationofpositivemarginsinpredictingbiochemicalrecurrenceafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywithaminimumfollowupof5years