From Brady to Murphy: gun control polarization in the decades since the 103rd congress

<p>Over the course of twelve Congressional sessions and twenty plus years since the passage of landmark gun control legislation (the Brady Bill and the Assault weapons ban) during the 103rd Congress, (1993-1994) polarization on the gun control issue between the Democratic and Republican partie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quinn, G
Other Authors: Martin, P
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
_version_ 1797113028301291520
author Quinn, G
author2 Martin, P
author_facet Martin, P
Quinn, G
author_sort Quinn, G
collection OXFORD
description <p>Over the course of twelve Congressional sessions and twenty plus years since the passage of landmark gun control legislation (the Brady Bill and the Assault weapons ban) during the 103rd Congress, (1993-1994) polarization on the gun control issue between the Democratic and Republican parties has increased significantly. Applying mixed qualitative methods, this case study aims to explain the shift from moderate levels during the 103rd to near complete partisan polarization on the issue by the 115th Congress (2017-2018). It will demonstrate that this shift was the culmination of the dissolution of opposition groups (consisting of members who crossed the party line in their gun issue voting) within each party, with each party following its own unique polarization trajectory, as disparate factors influenced their respective shifts. For the Republican party, who united on the issue over a decade before the Democratic party, the key variables impacting the fading of party support for gun control were the decline in salience of crime as a priority political issue in the early 2000s and the transition from the general to the primary electorate as the more salient voting bloc in regard to gun control. For the Democratic party, the key variables impacting the fading of party opposition to gun control were a loss of Southern and rural seats, coupled with gun control being re established as an electorally valuable issue for the party nationally in the years after the Sandy Hook shooting in late 2012. The thesis will contest the prevailing narrative that changes in party voting patterns must occur through replacement by demonstrating evidence of conversion- as numerous members of both parties shifted positions on gun control to vote the party line as electoral pressures and incentives influencing opposition group member voting changed. Furthermore, the thesis’s findings bolster the utility of ‘partisan asymmetry’ as a lens through which to approach the study of partisan polarization in Congress.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:03:40Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:76d41f07-b5d5-45b4-a608-635ffb1fc9b4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T03:57:56Z
publishDate 2019
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:76d41f07-b5d5-45b4-a608-635ffb1fc9b42024-03-22T12:29:52ZFrom Brady to Murphy: gun control polarization in the decades since the 103rd congressThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:76d41f07-b5d5-45b4-a608-635ffb1fc9b4American PoliticsEnglishORA Deposit2019Quinn, GMartin, P<p>Over the course of twelve Congressional sessions and twenty plus years since the passage of landmark gun control legislation (the Brady Bill and the Assault weapons ban) during the 103rd Congress, (1993-1994) polarization on the gun control issue between the Democratic and Republican parties has increased significantly. Applying mixed qualitative methods, this case study aims to explain the shift from moderate levels during the 103rd to near complete partisan polarization on the issue by the 115th Congress (2017-2018). It will demonstrate that this shift was the culmination of the dissolution of opposition groups (consisting of members who crossed the party line in their gun issue voting) within each party, with each party following its own unique polarization trajectory, as disparate factors influenced their respective shifts. For the Republican party, who united on the issue over a decade before the Democratic party, the key variables impacting the fading of party support for gun control were the decline in salience of crime as a priority political issue in the early 2000s and the transition from the general to the primary electorate as the more salient voting bloc in regard to gun control. For the Democratic party, the key variables impacting the fading of party opposition to gun control were a loss of Southern and rural seats, coupled with gun control being re established as an electorally valuable issue for the party nationally in the years after the Sandy Hook shooting in late 2012. The thesis will contest the prevailing narrative that changes in party voting patterns must occur through replacement by demonstrating evidence of conversion- as numerous members of both parties shifted positions on gun control to vote the party line as electoral pressures and incentives influencing opposition group member voting changed. Furthermore, the thesis’s findings bolster the utility of ‘partisan asymmetry’ as a lens through which to approach the study of partisan polarization in Congress.</p>
spellingShingle American Politics
Quinn, G
From Brady to Murphy: gun control polarization in the decades since the 103rd congress
title From Brady to Murphy: gun control polarization in the decades since the 103rd congress
title_full From Brady to Murphy: gun control polarization in the decades since the 103rd congress
title_fullStr From Brady to Murphy: gun control polarization in the decades since the 103rd congress
title_full_unstemmed From Brady to Murphy: gun control polarization in the decades since the 103rd congress
title_short From Brady to Murphy: gun control polarization in the decades since the 103rd congress
title_sort from brady to murphy gun control polarization in the decades since the 103rd congress
topic American Politics
work_keys_str_mv AT quinng frombradytomurphyguncontrolpolarizationinthedecadessincethe103rdcongress