The dark side of the empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime

This paper offers a critique of some recent new materialist approaches and their application to Roman expansionism. According to certain authors, ‘Romanisation’ should be about “understanding objects in motion”, a perspective that carries ethical implications. In contrast, we introduce the notion of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernández-Götz, M, Maschek, D, Roymans, N
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020
_version_ 1797076506816544768
author Fernández-Götz, M
Maschek, D
Roymans, N
author_facet Fernández-Götz, M
Maschek, D
Roymans, N
author_sort Fernández-Götz, M
collection OXFORD
description This paper offers a critique of some recent new materialist approaches and their application to Roman expansionism. According to certain authors, ‘Romanisation’ should be about “understanding objects in motion”, a perspective that carries ethical implications. In contrast, we introduce the notion of a predatory political economy as an alternative for conceptualising Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome. Our approach aims to make visible the dark sides of Roman expansionism in order to produce a more balanced and inclusive account. Two archaeological cases studies –Roman conquest and rural communities– are presented to illustrate the potential of such a perspective.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:04:43Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:772a01a4-e5f4-4094-8cac-563e1e1f7d0f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:04:43Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:772a01a4-e5f4-4094-8cac-563e1e1f7d0f2022-03-26T20:21:47ZThe dark side of the empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regimeJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:772a01a4-e5f4-4094-8cac-563e1e1f7d0fEnglishSymplectic ElementsCambridge University Press2020Fernández-Götz, MMaschek, DRoymans, NThis paper offers a critique of some recent new materialist approaches and their application to Roman expansionism. According to certain authors, ‘Romanisation’ should be about “understanding objects in motion”, a perspective that carries ethical implications. In contrast, we introduce the notion of a predatory political economy as an alternative for conceptualising Late Republican and Early Imperial Rome. Our approach aims to make visible the dark sides of Roman expansionism in order to produce a more balanced and inclusive account. Two archaeological cases studies –Roman conquest and rural communities– are presented to illustrate the potential of such a perspective.
spellingShingle Fernández-Götz, M
Maschek, D
Roymans, N
The dark side of the empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime
title The dark side of the empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime
title_full The dark side of the empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime
title_fullStr The dark side of the empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime
title_full_unstemmed The dark side of the empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime
title_short The dark side of the empire: Roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime
title_sort dark side of the empire roman expansionism between object agency and predatory regime
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezgotzm thedarksideoftheempireromanexpansionismbetweenobjectagencyandpredatoryregime
AT maschekd thedarksideoftheempireromanexpansionismbetweenobjectagencyandpredatoryregime
AT roymansn thedarksideoftheempireromanexpansionismbetweenobjectagencyandpredatoryregime
AT fernandezgotzm darksideoftheempireromanexpansionismbetweenobjectagencyandpredatoryregime
AT maschekd darksideoftheempireromanexpansionismbetweenobjectagencyandpredatoryregime
AT roymansn darksideoftheempireromanexpansionismbetweenobjectagencyandpredatoryregime