Personal ethical settings for driverless cars and the utility paradox: an ethical analysis of public attitudes in UK and Japan
Driverless cars are predicted to dramatically reduce collisions and casualties on the roads. However, there has been controversy about how they should be programmed to respond in the event of an unavoidable collision. Should they aim to save the most lives, prioritise the lives of pedestrians, or oc...
Main Authors: | Takaguchi, K, Kappes, A, Yearsley, JM, Sawai, T, Wilkinson, DJC, Savulescu, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Similar Items
-
Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance?
by: Ho, Shirley S.
Published: (2021) -
End of life care in the setting of extreme prematurity – practical challenges and ethical controversies
by: Wilkinson, DJC, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Driverless dreams : technological narratives and the shape of the automated car
by: Stayton, Erik Lee
Published: (2015) -
A conscious choice: is it ethical to aim for unconsciousness at the end of life?
by: Takla, A, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Equality or utility? Ethics and law of rationing ventilators
by: Savulescu, J, et al.
Published: (2020)