Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
<p><strong>Background</strong> Patients with Achilles tendon rupture who have non-operative treatment have traditionally been treated with immobilisation of the tendon in plaster casts for several weeks. Functional bracing is an alternative non-operative treatment that allows earli...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2020
|
| _version_ | 1797076586828136448 |
|---|---|
| author | Costa, ML Achten, J Marian, IR Dutton, SJ Lamb, SE Ollivere, B Maredza, M Petrou, S Kearney, RS Abdallah, A Ballal, M Ballester, J Beastall, J Bhattacharya, R Burrt, S Deakin, M Deol, R Dramis, A El-Kawy, S Eyre, J Forder, J Ghosh, A Guha, A Hancock, N Harrold, F Harwood, P Hull, P Johnstone, A Kapoor, S Karagkevrekis, B Kelly, A Kurdy, N Kurup, H Lyle, V Madan, S Madeley, J Mahmood, A Malik, A McAndrew, A Mishra, V Modi, N Nanda, R Reichert, I Reissis, N Sampalli, S Scott, A Walter, R Westwood, M |
| author_facet | Costa, ML Achten, J Marian, IR Dutton, SJ Lamb, SE Ollivere, B Maredza, M Petrou, S Kearney, RS Abdallah, A Ballal, M Ballester, J Beastall, J Bhattacharya, R Burrt, S Deakin, M Deol, R Dramis, A El-Kawy, S Eyre, J Forder, J Ghosh, A Guha, A Hancock, N Harrold, F Harwood, P Hull, P Johnstone, A Kapoor, S Karagkevrekis, B Kelly, A Kurdy, N Kurup, H Lyle, V Madan, S Madeley, J Mahmood, A Malik, A McAndrew, A Mishra, V Modi, N Nanda, R Reichert, I Reissis, N Sampalli, S Scott, A Walter, R Westwood, M |
| author_sort | Costa, ML |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p><strong>Background</strong>
Patients with Achilles tendon rupture who have non-operative treatment have traditionally been treated with immobilisation of the tendon in plaster casts for several weeks. Functional bracing is an alternative non-operative treatment that allows earlier mobilisation, but evidence on its effectiveness and safety is scarce. The aim of the UKSTAR trial was to compare functional and quality-of-life outcomes and resource use in patients treated non-operatively with plaster cast versus functional brace.</p>
<p><strong>Methods</strong>
UKSTAR was a pragmatic, superiority, multicentre, randomised controlled trial done at 39 hospitals in the UK. Patients (aged ≥16 years) who were being treated non-operatively for a primary Achilles tendon rupture at the participating centres were potentially eligible. The exclusion criteria were presenting more than 14 days after injury, previous rupture of the same Achilles tendon, or being unable to complete the questionnaires. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a plaster cast or functional brace using a centralised web-based system. Because the interventions were clearly visible, neither patients nor clinicians could be masked. Participants wore the intervention for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was patient-reported Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) at 9 months, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients in the groups to which they were allocated, excluding participants who withdrew or died before providing any outcome data). The main safety outcome was the incidence of tendon re-rupture. Resource use was recorded from a health and personal social care perspective. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN62639639.</p>
<p><strong>Findings</strong>
Between Aug 15, 2016, and May 31, 2018, 1451 patients were screened, of whom 540 participants (mean age 48·7 years, 79% male) were randomly allocated to receive plaster cast (n=266) or functional brace (n=274). 527 (98%) of 540 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, and 13 (2%) were excluded because they withdrew or died before providing any outcome data. There was no difference in ATRS at 9 months post injury (cast group n=244, mean ATRS 74∙4 [SD 19∙8]; functional brace group n=259, ATRS 72∙8 [20∙4]; adjusted mean difference –1∙38 [95% CI –4∙9 to 2∙1], p=0·44). There was no difference in the rate of re-rupture of the tendon (17 [6%] of 266 in the plaster cast group vs 13 [5%] of 274 in the functional brace group, p=0·40). The mean total health and personal social care cost was £1181 for the plaster cast group and £1078 for the functional bract group (mean between-group difference –£103 [95% CI –289 to 84]).</p>
<p><strong>Interpretation</strong>
Traditional plaster casting was not found to be superior to early weight-bearing in a functional brace, as measured by ATRS, in the management of patients treated non-surgically for Achilles tendon rupture. Clinicians may consider the use of early weight-bearing in a functional brace as a safe and cost-effective alternative to plaster casting.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:05:48Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:777f4c64-e91d-422b-8b2a-af6ae9dc47f6 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:05:48Z |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:777f4c64-e91d-422b-8b2a-af6ae9dc47f62022-03-26T20:24:34ZPlaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:777f4c64-e91d-422b-8b2a-af6ae9dc47f6EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2020Costa, MLAchten, JMarian, IRDutton, SJLamb, SEOllivere, BMaredza, MPetrou, SKearney, RSAbdallah, ABallal, MBallester, JBeastall, JBhattacharya, RBurrt, SDeakin, MDeol, RDramis, AEl-Kawy, SEyre, JForder, JGhosh, AGuha, AHancock, NHarrold, FHarwood, PHull, PJohnstone, AKapoor, SKaragkevrekis, BKelly, AKurdy, NKurup, HLyle, VMadan, SMadeley, JMahmood, AMalik, AMcAndrew, AMishra, VModi, NNanda, RReichert, IReissis, NSampalli, SScott, AWalter, RWestwood, M<p><strong>Background</strong> Patients with Achilles tendon rupture who have non-operative treatment have traditionally been treated with immobilisation of the tendon in plaster casts for several weeks. Functional bracing is an alternative non-operative treatment that allows earlier mobilisation, but evidence on its effectiveness and safety is scarce. The aim of the UKSTAR trial was to compare functional and quality-of-life outcomes and resource use in patients treated non-operatively with plaster cast versus functional brace.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong> UKSTAR was a pragmatic, superiority, multicentre, randomised controlled trial done at 39 hospitals in the UK. Patients (aged ≥16 years) who were being treated non-operatively for a primary Achilles tendon rupture at the participating centres were potentially eligible. The exclusion criteria were presenting more than 14 days after injury, previous rupture of the same Achilles tendon, or being unable to complete the questionnaires. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a plaster cast or functional brace using a centralised web-based system. Because the interventions were clearly visible, neither patients nor clinicians could be masked. Participants wore the intervention for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was patient-reported Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) at 9 months, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients in the groups to which they were allocated, excluding participants who withdrew or died before providing any outcome data). The main safety outcome was the incidence of tendon re-rupture. Resource use was recorded from a health and personal social care perspective. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN62639639.</p> <p><strong>Findings</strong> Between Aug 15, 2016, and May 31, 2018, 1451 patients were screened, of whom 540 participants (mean age 48·7 years, 79% male) were randomly allocated to receive plaster cast (n=266) or functional brace (n=274). 527 (98%) of 540 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, and 13 (2%) were excluded because they withdrew or died before providing any outcome data. There was no difference in ATRS at 9 months post injury (cast group n=244, mean ATRS 74∙4 [SD 19∙8]; functional brace group n=259, ATRS 72∙8 [20∙4]; adjusted mean difference –1∙38 [95% CI –4∙9 to 2∙1], p=0·44). There was no difference in the rate of re-rupture of the tendon (17 [6%] of 266 in the plaster cast group vs 13 [5%] of 274 in the functional brace group, p=0·40). The mean total health and personal social care cost was £1181 for the plaster cast group and £1078 for the functional bract group (mean between-group difference –£103 [95% CI –289 to 84]).</p> <p><strong>Interpretation</strong> Traditional plaster casting was not found to be superior to early weight-bearing in a functional brace, as measured by ATRS, in the management of patients treated non-surgically for Achilles tendon rupture. Clinicians may consider the use of early weight-bearing in a functional brace as a safe and cost-effective alternative to plaster casting.</p> |
| spellingShingle | Costa, ML Achten, J Marian, IR Dutton, SJ Lamb, SE Ollivere, B Maredza, M Petrou, S Kearney, RS Abdallah, A Ballal, M Ballester, J Beastall, J Bhattacharya, R Burrt, S Deakin, M Deol, R Dramis, A El-Kawy, S Eyre, J Forder, J Ghosh, A Guha, A Hancock, N Harrold, F Harwood, P Hull, P Johnstone, A Kapoor, S Karagkevrekis, B Kelly, A Kurdy, N Kurup, H Lyle, V Madan, S Madeley, J Mahmood, A Malik, A McAndrew, A Mishra, V Modi, N Nanda, R Reichert, I Reissis, N Sampalli, S Scott, A Walter, R Westwood, M Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
| title | Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
| title_full | Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
| title_fullStr | Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
| title_short | Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
| title_sort | plaster cast versus functional brace for non surgical treatment of achilles tendon rupture ukstar a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT costaml plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT achtenj plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT marianir plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT duttonsj plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT lambse plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT ollivereb plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT maredzam plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT petrous plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT kearneyrs plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT abdallaha plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT ballalm plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT ballesterj plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT beastallj plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT bhattacharyar plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT burrts plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT deakinm plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT deolr plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT dramisa plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT elkawys plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT eyrej plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT forderj plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT ghosha plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT guhaa plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT hancockn plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT harroldf plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT harwoodp plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT hullp plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT johnstonea plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT kapoors plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT karagkevrekisb plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT kellya plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT kurdyn plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT kuruph plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT lylev plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT madans plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT madeleyj plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT mahmooda plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT malika plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT mcandrewa plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT mishrav plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT modin plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT nandar plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT reicherti plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT reissisn plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT sampallis plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT scotta plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT walterr plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation AT westwoodm plastercastversusfunctionalbracefornonsurgicaltreatmentofachillestendonruptureukstaramulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation |