Two-stage randomization designs in drug development.

One challenge in oncology drug development is to determine whether a new agent to the care of patients should be added concurrently as a new component to standard of care (SOC) induction treatment, used sequentially as an extended maintenance treatment after SOC induction for patients responding to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wolbers, M, Helterbrand, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2008
_version_ 1826279919983788032
author Wolbers, M
Helterbrand, J
author_facet Wolbers, M
Helterbrand, J
author_sort Wolbers, M
collection OXFORD
description One challenge in oncology drug development is to determine whether a new agent to the care of patients should be added concurrently as a new component to standard of care (SOC) induction treatment, used sequentially as an extended maintenance treatment after SOC induction for patients responding to induction therapy, or used in both the induction and the maintenance settings. A two-stage randomization design (TSRD) addresses these questions simultaneously. In such trials patients are initially randomized to two induction therapies, followed by another randomization to maintenance therapy contingent upon disease remission under induction therapy. We survey recently proposed methods for analyzing time-to-event endpoints in TSRDs and discuss several issues related to the use of TSRDs including sample size calculation and multiplicity. An alternative drug development strategy is to perform several single randomization designs (SRDs) comparing induction and maintenance regimens, respectively. We present a simulation study, which compares TSRDs to several strategies based on SRDs in terms of total sample size and time to reach clinical decisions.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:06:00Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:778e4b80-b358-40f6-aeb3-b03843386b38
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:06:00Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:778e4b80-b358-40f6-aeb3-b03843386b382022-03-26T20:24:50ZTwo-stage randomization designs in drug development.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:778e4b80-b358-40f6-aeb3-b03843386b38EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Wolbers, MHelterbrand, JOne challenge in oncology drug development is to determine whether a new agent to the care of patients should be added concurrently as a new component to standard of care (SOC) induction treatment, used sequentially as an extended maintenance treatment after SOC induction for patients responding to induction therapy, or used in both the induction and the maintenance settings. A two-stage randomization design (TSRD) addresses these questions simultaneously. In such trials patients are initially randomized to two induction therapies, followed by another randomization to maintenance therapy contingent upon disease remission under induction therapy. We survey recently proposed methods for analyzing time-to-event endpoints in TSRDs and discuss several issues related to the use of TSRDs including sample size calculation and multiplicity. An alternative drug development strategy is to perform several single randomization designs (SRDs) comparing induction and maintenance regimens, respectively. We present a simulation study, which compares TSRDs to several strategies based on SRDs in terms of total sample size and time to reach clinical decisions.
spellingShingle Wolbers, M
Helterbrand, J
Two-stage randomization designs in drug development.
title Two-stage randomization designs in drug development.
title_full Two-stage randomization designs in drug development.
title_fullStr Two-stage randomization designs in drug development.
title_full_unstemmed Two-stage randomization designs in drug development.
title_short Two-stage randomization designs in drug development.
title_sort two stage randomization designs in drug development
work_keys_str_mv AT wolbersm twostagerandomizationdesignsindrugdevelopment
AT helterbrandj twostagerandomizationdesignsindrugdevelopment