Quantitative Comparison of Effects of Dofetilide, Sotalol, Quinidine, and Verapamil between Human Ex vivo Trabeculae and In silico Ventricular Models Incorporating Inter-Individual Action Potential Variability
Background: In silico modeling could soon become a mainstream method of pro-arrhythmic risk assessment in drug development. However, a lack of human-specific data and appropriate modeling techniques has previously prevented quantitative comparison of drug effects between in silico models and recordi...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media
2017
|
| _version_ | 1797076601713721344 |
|---|---|
| author | Britton, O Abi-Gerges, N Page, G Ghetti, A Miller, P Rodriguez, B |
| author_facet | Britton, O Abi-Gerges, N Page, G Ghetti, A Miller, P Rodriguez, B |
| author_sort | Britton, O |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Background: In silico modeling could soon become a mainstream method of pro-arrhythmic risk assessment in drug development. However, a lack of human-specific data and appropriate modeling techniques has previously prevented quantitative comparison of drug effects between in silico models and recordings from human cardiac preparations. Here, we directly compare changes in repolarization biomarkers caused by dofetilide, dl-sotalol, quinidine, and verapamil, between in silico populations of human ventricular cell models and ex vivo human ventricular trabeculae. <br/><br/> Methods and Results: Ex vivo recordings from human ventricular trabeculae in control conditions were used to develop populations of in silico human ventricular cell models that integrated intra- and inter-individual variability in action potential (AP) biomarker values. Models were based on the O'Hara-Rudy ventricular cardiomyocyte model, but integrated experimental AP variability through variation in underlying ionic conductances. Changes to AP duration, triangulation and early after-depolarization occurrence from application of the four drugs at multiple concentrations and pacing frequencies were compared between simulations and experiments. To assess the impact of variability in IC50 measurements, and the effects of including state-dependent drug binding dynamics, each drug simulation was repeated with two different IC50 datasets, and with both the original O'Hara-Rudy hERG model and a recently published state-dependent model of hERG and hERG block. For the selective hERG blockers dofetilide and sotalol, simulation predictions of AP prolongation and repolarization abnormality occurrence showed overall good agreement with experiments. However, for multichannel blockers quinidine and verapamil, simulations were not in agreement with experiments across all IC50 datasets and IKr block models tested. Quinidine simulations resulted in overprolonged APs and high incidence of repolarization abnormalities, which were not observed in experiments. Verapamil simulations showed substantial AP prolongation while experiments showed mild AP shortening. <br/><br/> Conclusions: Results for dofetilide and sotalol show good agreement between experiments and simulations for selective compounds, however lack of agreement from simulations of quinidine and verapamil suggest further work is needed to understand the more complex electrophysiological effects of these multichannel blocking drugs. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:06:01Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:778fc76f-d7b4-4575-a073-ce3230d7ae3c |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:06:01Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:778fc76f-d7b4-4575-a073-ce3230d7ae3c2022-03-26T20:24:57ZQuantitative Comparison of Effects of Dofetilide, Sotalol, Quinidine, and Verapamil between Human Ex vivo Trabeculae and In silico Ventricular Models Incorporating Inter-Individual Action Potential VariabilityJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:778fc76f-d7b4-4575-a073-ce3230d7ae3cSymplectic Elements at OxfordFrontiers Media2017Britton, OAbi-Gerges, NPage, GGhetti, AMiller, PRodriguez, BBackground: In silico modeling could soon become a mainstream method of pro-arrhythmic risk assessment in drug development. However, a lack of human-specific data and appropriate modeling techniques has previously prevented quantitative comparison of drug effects between in silico models and recordings from human cardiac preparations. Here, we directly compare changes in repolarization biomarkers caused by dofetilide, dl-sotalol, quinidine, and verapamil, between in silico populations of human ventricular cell models and ex vivo human ventricular trabeculae. <br/><br/> Methods and Results: Ex vivo recordings from human ventricular trabeculae in control conditions were used to develop populations of in silico human ventricular cell models that integrated intra- and inter-individual variability in action potential (AP) biomarker values. Models were based on the O'Hara-Rudy ventricular cardiomyocyte model, but integrated experimental AP variability through variation in underlying ionic conductances. Changes to AP duration, triangulation and early after-depolarization occurrence from application of the four drugs at multiple concentrations and pacing frequencies were compared between simulations and experiments. To assess the impact of variability in IC50 measurements, and the effects of including state-dependent drug binding dynamics, each drug simulation was repeated with two different IC50 datasets, and with both the original O'Hara-Rudy hERG model and a recently published state-dependent model of hERG and hERG block. For the selective hERG blockers dofetilide and sotalol, simulation predictions of AP prolongation and repolarization abnormality occurrence showed overall good agreement with experiments. However, for multichannel blockers quinidine and verapamil, simulations were not in agreement with experiments across all IC50 datasets and IKr block models tested. Quinidine simulations resulted in overprolonged APs and high incidence of repolarization abnormalities, which were not observed in experiments. Verapamil simulations showed substantial AP prolongation while experiments showed mild AP shortening. <br/><br/> Conclusions: Results for dofetilide and sotalol show good agreement between experiments and simulations for selective compounds, however lack of agreement from simulations of quinidine and verapamil suggest further work is needed to understand the more complex electrophysiological effects of these multichannel blocking drugs. |
| spellingShingle | Britton, O Abi-Gerges, N Page, G Ghetti, A Miller, P Rodriguez, B Quantitative Comparison of Effects of Dofetilide, Sotalol, Quinidine, and Verapamil between Human Ex vivo Trabeculae and In silico Ventricular Models Incorporating Inter-Individual Action Potential Variability |
| title | Quantitative Comparison of Effects of Dofetilide, Sotalol, Quinidine, and Verapamil between Human Ex vivo Trabeculae and In silico Ventricular Models Incorporating Inter-Individual Action Potential Variability |
| title_full | Quantitative Comparison of Effects of Dofetilide, Sotalol, Quinidine, and Verapamil between Human Ex vivo Trabeculae and In silico Ventricular Models Incorporating Inter-Individual Action Potential Variability |
| title_fullStr | Quantitative Comparison of Effects of Dofetilide, Sotalol, Quinidine, and Verapamil between Human Ex vivo Trabeculae and In silico Ventricular Models Incorporating Inter-Individual Action Potential Variability |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Comparison of Effects of Dofetilide, Sotalol, Quinidine, and Verapamil between Human Ex vivo Trabeculae and In silico Ventricular Models Incorporating Inter-Individual Action Potential Variability |
| title_short | Quantitative Comparison of Effects of Dofetilide, Sotalol, Quinidine, and Verapamil between Human Ex vivo Trabeculae and In silico Ventricular Models Incorporating Inter-Individual Action Potential Variability |
| title_sort | quantitative comparison of effects of dofetilide sotalol quinidine and verapamil between human ex vivo trabeculae and in silico ventricular models incorporating inter individual action potential variability |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT brittono quantitativecomparisonofeffectsofdofetilidesotalolquinidineandverapamilbetweenhumanexvivotrabeculaeandinsilicoventricularmodelsincorporatinginterindividualactionpotentialvariability AT abigergesn quantitativecomparisonofeffectsofdofetilidesotalolquinidineandverapamilbetweenhumanexvivotrabeculaeandinsilicoventricularmodelsincorporatinginterindividualactionpotentialvariability AT pageg quantitativecomparisonofeffectsofdofetilidesotalolquinidineandverapamilbetweenhumanexvivotrabeculaeandinsilicoventricularmodelsincorporatinginterindividualactionpotentialvariability AT ghettia quantitativecomparisonofeffectsofdofetilidesotalolquinidineandverapamilbetweenhumanexvivotrabeculaeandinsilicoventricularmodelsincorporatinginterindividualactionpotentialvariability AT millerp quantitativecomparisonofeffectsofdofetilidesotalolquinidineandverapamilbetweenhumanexvivotrabeculaeandinsilicoventricularmodelsincorporatinginterindividualactionpotentialvariability AT rodriguezb quantitativecomparisonofeffectsofdofetilidesotalolquinidineandverapamilbetweenhumanexvivotrabeculaeandinsilicoventricularmodelsincorporatinginterindividualactionpotentialvariability |