Complicity and causality

This paper considers some aspects of the morality of complicity, understood as participation in the wrongs of another. The central question is whether there is some way of participating in the wrongs of another other than by making a causal contribution to them. I suggest that there is not. In defen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gardner, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2007
Subjects:
_version_ 1797076707360899072
author Gardner, J
author_facet Gardner, J
author_sort Gardner, J
collection OXFORD
description This paper considers some aspects of the morality of complicity, understood as participation in the wrongs of another. The central question is whether there is some way of participating in the wrongs of another other than by making a causal contribution to them. I suggest that there is not. In defending this view I encounter, and resist, the claim that it undermines the distinction between principals and accomplices. I argue that this distinction is embedded in the structure of rational agency.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:07:35Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:78135c03-a0f7-47b8-884f-c1838ddcb982
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:07:35Z
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:78135c03-a0f7-47b8-884f-c1838ddcb9822022-03-26T20:28:20ZComplicity and causalityJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:78135c03-a0f7-47b8-884f-c1838ddcb982LawPhilosophyEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetSpringer2007Gardner, JThis paper considers some aspects of the morality of complicity, understood as participation in the wrongs of another. The central question is whether there is some way of participating in the wrongs of another other than by making a causal contribution to them. I suggest that there is not. In defending this view I encounter, and resist, the claim that it undermines the distinction between principals and accomplices. I argue that this distinction is embedded in the structure of rational agency.
spellingShingle Law
Philosophy
Gardner, J
Complicity and causality
title Complicity and causality
title_full Complicity and causality
title_fullStr Complicity and causality
title_full_unstemmed Complicity and causality
title_short Complicity and causality
title_sort complicity and causality
topic Law
Philosophy
work_keys_str_mv AT gardnerj complicityandcausality