John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics

Many readers know the tale of how William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) calculated the age of the Earth from physical principles and adhered for over 50 years to an estimate that was far younger than geologists' estimates, despite the virtually unanimous opposition of the geological community of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: England, P, Molnar, P, Richter, F
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2007
_version_ 1797076757621243904
author England, P
Molnar, P
Richter, F
author_facet England, P
Molnar, P
Richter, F
author_sort England, P
collection OXFORD
description Many readers know the tale of how William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) calculated the age of the Earth from physical principles and adhered for over 50 years to an estimate that was far younger than geologists' estimates, despite the virtually unanimous opposition of the geological community of the time. The prevalent version of this tale alleges that the discovery of radioactivity simultaneously provided the demonstration (through radiometric dating) that Kelvin had greatly underestimated the age of the Earth and the explanation of why he was wrong (radioactivity being a source of heat that invalidated Kelvin's calculation). We show this popular story to be incorrect; introducing the known distribution of radioactivity into Kelvin's calculation does not invalidate its conclusion. In 1895, before the discovery of radioactivity, John Perry showed that convection in the Earth's interior would invalidate Kelvin's estimate for the age of the Earth, but Perry's analysis was neglected or forgotten, with the consequence that a powerful argument in favor of mobilism was overlooked during the first few decades of debate about continental drift.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:08:20Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:7854d3c6-676f-445a-918d-0a28ecb9b6a0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:08:20Z
publishDate 2007
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7854d3c6-676f-445a-918d-0a28ecb9b6a02022-03-26T20:30:04ZJohn Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamicsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7854d3c6-676f-445a-918d-0a28ecb9b6a0EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2007England, PMolnar, PRichter, FMany readers know the tale of how William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) calculated the age of the Earth from physical principles and adhered for over 50 years to an estimate that was far younger than geologists' estimates, despite the virtually unanimous opposition of the geological community of the time. The prevalent version of this tale alleges that the discovery of radioactivity simultaneously provided the demonstration (through radiometric dating) that Kelvin had greatly underestimated the age of the Earth and the explanation of why he was wrong (radioactivity being a source of heat that invalidated Kelvin's calculation). We show this popular story to be incorrect; introducing the known distribution of radioactivity into Kelvin's calculation does not invalidate its conclusion. In 1895, before the discovery of radioactivity, John Perry showed that convection in the Earth's interior would invalidate Kelvin's estimate for the age of the Earth, but Perry's analysis was neglected or forgotten, with the consequence that a powerful argument in favor of mobilism was overlooked during the first few decades of debate about continental drift.
spellingShingle England, P
Molnar, P
Richter, F
John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics
title John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics
title_full John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics
title_fullStr John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics
title_full_unstemmed John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics
title_short John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics
title_sort john perry s neglected critique of kelvin s age for the earth a missed opportunity in geodynamics
work_keys_str_mv AT englandp johnperrysneglectedcritiqueofkelvinsagefortheearthamissedopportunityingeodynamics
AT molnarp johnperrysneglectedcritiqueofkelvinsagefortheearthamissedopportunityingeodynamics
AT richterf johnperrysneglectedcritiqueofkelvinsagefortheearthamissedopportunityingeodynamics