The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads

<p>The primary aim of this paper was to manufacture aluminium curved-crease foldcores and assess their behaviour under quasi-static compressive loads, relative to existing straight-crease foldcores and a honeycomb cores. Four foldcore types, standard, indented, and two curved-crease foldcore...

Olles dieđut

Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkkit: Gattas, J, You, Z
Materiálatiipa: Journal article
Almmustuhtton: Elsevier 2014
_version_ 1826280129617199104
author Gattas, J
You, Z
author_facet Gattas, J
You, Z
author_sort Gattas, J
collection OXFORD
description <p>The primary aim of this paper was to manufacture aluminium curved-crease foldcores and assess their behaviour under quasi-static compressive loads, relative to existing straight-crease foldcores and a honeycomb cores. Four foldcore types, standard, indented, and two curved-crease foldcore tessellations, were constructed with comparable density and height to a commercial honeycomb core. An experimental and numerical study of foldcore performance under quasi-static crush loads showed that all foldcore types were highly sensitive to geometric imperfections, and that curved-crease foldcores had significantly higher energy-absorption capability than straight-crease foldcores. Validated numerical methods were used in a comprehensive parametric study on curved-crease foldcore geometry, with two main findings. First, it was seen that altering the curved-crease foldcore tessellation did not provide significant energy-absorption capability beyond that achievable with direct changes to the core aspect ratio. Second, an optimum configuration of the curved-crease foldcore was found which appeared to offer a comparable out-of-plane strength, energy-absorption under quasi-static compressive loads, and stiffness to a honeycomb core. A brief numerical investigation into low-velocity impact loading showed that curved-crease foldcores were the only foldcore type that saw a substantial inertial strengthening under dynamic loading, although not to as large an extent as honeycomb.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:09:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:7897ef8d-5c5d-495c-abca-d2c20c854796
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:09:05Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7897ef8d-5c5d-495c-abca-d2c20c8547962022-03-26T20:31:39Z The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7897ef8d-5c5d-495c-abca-d2c20c854796Symplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2014Gattas, JYou, Z <p>The primary aim of this paper was to manufacture aluminium curved-crease foldcores and assess their behaviour under quasi-static compressive loads, relative to existing straight-crease foldcores and a honeycomb cores. Four foldcore types, standard, indented, and two curved-crease foldcore tessellations, were constructed with comparable density and height to a commercial honeycomb core. An experimental and numerical study of foldcore performance under quasi-static crush loads showed that all foldcore types were highly sensitive to geometric imperfections, and that curved-crease foldcores had significantly higher energy-absorption capability than straight-crease foldcores. Validated numerical methods were used in a comprehensive parametric study on curved-crease foldcore geometry, with two main findings. First, it was seen that altering the curved-crease foldcore tessellation did not provide significant energy-absorption capability beyond that achievable with direct changes to the core aspect ratio. Second, an optimum configuration of the curved-crease foldcore was found which appeared to offer a comparable out-of-plane strength, energy-absorption under quasi-static compressive loads, and stiffness to a honeycomb core. A brief numerical investigation into low-velocity impact loading showed that curved-crease foldcores were the only foldcore type that saw a substantial inertial strengthening under dynamic loading, although not to as large an extent as honeycomb.</p>
spellingShingle Gattas, J
You, Z
The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads
title The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads
title_full The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads
title_fullStr The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads
title_full_unstemmed The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads
title_short The behaviour of curved-crease foldcores under low-velocity impact loads
title_sort behaviour of curved crease foldcores under low velocity impact loads
work_keys_str_mv AT gattasj thebehaviourofcurvedcreasefoldcoresunderlowvelocityimpactloads
AT youz thebehaviourofcurvedcreasefoldcoresunderlowvelocityimpactloads
AT gattasj behaviourofcurvedcreasefoldcoresunderlowvelocityimpactloads
AT youz behaviourofcurvedcreasefoldcoresunderlowvelocityimpactloads