Choosing between unicompartmental and total knee replacement: what can economic evaluations tell us? A systematic review
<strong>Background and Objective:</strong> Patients with anteromedial arthritis who require a knee replacement could receive either a unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) or a total knee replacement (TKR). This review has been undertaken to identify economic evaluations comparing UKR...
Päätekijät: | Burn, E, Liddle, A, Hamilton, T, Pai, S, Pandit, H, Murray, D, Pinedo Villanueva, R |
---|---|
Aineistotyyppi: | Journal article |
Julkaistu: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Samankaltaisia teoksia
-
Cost-utility of unicompartmental compared to total knee replacements: an analysis based on matched routinely-collected data from the United Kingdom
Tekijä: Burn, E, et al.
Julkaistu: (2016) -
Bias and unicompartmental knee replacement
Tekijä: Murray, D, et al.
Julkaistu: (2017) -
Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement: a population-based study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales
Tekijä: Burn, E, et al.
Julkaistu: (2018) -
Effect of surgical caseload on revision rate following total and unicompartmental knee replacement
Tekijä: Liddle, A, et al.
Julkaistu: (2016) -
Failure of unicompartmental knee replacement
Tekijä: Liddle, A
Julkaistu: (2013)