A compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions

Background: Negative beliefs about the self, including low self-compassion, have been identified as a putative causal factor in the occurrence of paranoia. Therefore, improving self-compassion may be one route to reduce paranoia. Aims: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Forkert, A, Brown, P, Freeman, D, Waite, F
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021
_version_ 1797077173620703232
author Forkert, A
Brown, P
Freeman, D
Waite, F
author_facet Forkert, A
Brown, P
Freeman, D
Waite, F
author_sort Forkert, A
collection OXFORD
description Background: Negative beliefs about the self, including low self-compassion, have been identified as a putative causal factor in the occurrence of paranoia. Therefore, improving self-compassion may be one route to reduce paranoia. Aims: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical effects of a brief compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions. Method: Twelve patients with persecutory delusions received an individual four-session compassionate imagery intervention. Assessments of self-concept and paranoia were completed before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 1-month follow-up. A qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the treatment was also completed. Results: Twelve out of 14 eligible patients referred to the study agreed to take part. All participants completed all therapy sessions and assessments. Post-treatment, there were improvements in self-compassion (change score –0.64, 95% CI –1.04, –0.24, d = –1.78), negative beliefs about the self (change score 2.42, 95% CI –0.37, 5.20, d = 0.51), and paranoia (change score 10.08, 95% CI 3.47, 16.69, d = 0.61). There were no serious adverse events. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: ‘effortful learning’, ‘seeing change’ and ‘taking it forward’. Participants described a process of active and effortful engagement in therapy which was rewarded with positive changes, including feeling calmer, gaining clarity, and developing acceptance. Conclusion: This uncontrolled feasibility study indicates that a brief compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions is feasible, acceptable, and may lead to clinical benefits.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:14:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:7a3b1f65-5945-47c9-9632-177ac3b5c3b0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:14:05Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7a3b1f65-5945-47c9-9632-177ac3b5c3b02022-03-26T20:42:39ZA compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusionsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7a3b1f65-5945-47c9-9632-177ac3b5c3b0EnglishSymplectic ElementsCambridge University Press2021Forkert, ABrown, PFreeman, DWaite, FBackground: Negative beliefs about the self, including low self-compassion, have been identified as a putative causal factor in the occurrence of paranoia. Therefore, improving self-compassion may be one route to reduce paranoia. Aims: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical effects of a brief compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions. Method: Twelve patients with persecutory delusions received an individual four-session compassionate imagery intervention. Assessments of self-concept and paranoia were completed before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 1-month follow-up. A qualitative study exploring participants’ experiences of the treatment was also completed. Results: Twelve out of 14 eligible patients referred to the study agreed to take part. All participants completed all therapy sessions and assessments. Post-treatment, there were improvements in self-compassion (change score –0.64, 95% CI –1.04, –0.24, d = –1.78), negative beliefs about the self (change score 2.42, 95% CI –0.37, 5.20, d = 0.51), and paranoia (change score 10.08, 95% CI 3.47, 16.69, d = 0.61). There were no serious adverse events. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: ‘effortful learning’, ‘seeing change’ and ‘taking it forward’. Participants described a process of active and effortful engagement in therapy which was rewarded with positive changes, including feeling calmer, gaining clarity, and developing acceptance. Conclusion: This uncontrolled feasibility study indicates that a brief compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions is feasible, acceptable, and may lead to clinical benefits.
spellingShingle Forkert, A
Brown, P
Freeman, D
Waite, F
A compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions
title A compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions
title_full A compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions
title_fullStr A compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions
title_full_unstemmed A compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions
title_short A compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions
title_sort compassionate imagery intervention for patients with persecutory delusions
work_keys_str_mv AT forkerta acompassionateimageryinterventionforpatientswithpersecutorydelusions
AT brownp acompassionateimageryinterventionforpatientswithpersecutorydelusions
AT freemand acompassionateimageryinterventionforpatientswithpersecutorydelusions
AT waitef acompassionateimageryinterventionforpatientswithpersecutorydelusions
AT forkerta compassionateimageryinterventionforpatientswithpersecutorydelusions
AT brownp compassionateimageryinterventionforpatientswithpersecutorydelusions
AT freemand compassionateimageryinterventionforpatientswithpersecutorydelusions
AT waitef compassionateimageryinterventionforpatientswithpersecutorydelusions